The DOI matches its Crossref record; 218 of the 218 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein–protein interaction and quaternary structure
Abstract
Protein–protein recognition plays an essential role in structure and function. Specific non-covalent interactions stabilize the structure of macromolecular assemblies, exemplified in this review by oligomeric proteins and the capsids of icosahedral viruses. They also allow proteins to form complexes that have a very wide range of stability and lifetimes and are involved in all cellular processes. We present some of the structure-based computational methods that have been developed to characterize the quaternary structure of oligomeric proteins and other molecular assemblies and analyze the properties of the interfaces between the subunits. We compare the size, the chemical and amino acid compositions and the atomic packing of the subunit interfaces of protein–protein complexes, oligomeric proteins, viral capsids and protein–nucleic acid complexes. These biologically significant interfaces are generally close-packed, whereas the non-specific interfaces between molecules in protein crystals are loosely packed, an observation that gives a structural basis to specific recognition. A distinction is made within each interface between a core that contains buried atoms and a solvent accessible rim. The core and the rim differ in their amino acid composition and their conservation in evolution, and the distinction helps correlating the structural data with the results of site-directed mutagenesis and in vitro studies of self-assembly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
Inference of Macromolecular Assemblies from Crystalline State
Krissinel, E., & Henrick, K. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022 · Cited by 9,984
On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model
Monod, J., Wyman, J., & Changeux, J.-P. (1965) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80285-6 · Cited by 8,825
Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T., & Chothia, C. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80134-2 · Cited by 6,445
The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility
Lee, B., & Richards, F. M. (1971) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x · Cited by 5,850
Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. A., & Honig, B. (1991) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340110407 · Cited by 5,240
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki481 · Cited by 3,018
Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Krogan, N. J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., Zhong, G., Guo, X., Ignatchenko, A., Li, J., Pu, S., Datta, N., Tikuisis, A. P., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04670 · Cited by 2,952
PERUTZ, M. F. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/228726a0 · Cited by 2,926
Cited by
Lu, H., Zhou, Q., He, J., Jiang, Z., Peng, C., Tong, R., & Shi, J. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00315-3 · Cited by 891
Probing Native Protein Structures by Chemical Cross-linking, Mass Spectrometry, and Bioinformatics
Leitner, A., Walzthoeni, T., Kahraman, A., Herzog, F., Rinner, O., Beck, M., & Aebersold, R. (2010) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r000001-mcp201 · Cited by 458
Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials
Xie, X., Yu, T., Li, X., Zhang, N., Foster, L. J., Peng, C., Huang, W., & He, G. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01589-z · Cited by 396
Allostery and the Monod-Wyman-Changeux Model After 50 Years
Changeux, J.-P. (2012) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102222 · Cited by 391
Oncogenic protein interfaces: small molecules, big challenges
Nero, T. L., Morton, C. J., Holien, J. K., Wielens, J., & Parker, M. W. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3690 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Janin, J., Bahadur, R. P., & Chakrabarti, P.
- Venue
- Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-180
- ISSN
- 0033-5835 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8994
- OpenAlex
- W2142796125
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 218
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein–protein interaction and quaternary structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033583508004708
- The paper
- Janin, J., Bahadur, R. P., & Chakrabarti, P. (2008). Protein–protein interaction and quaternary structure. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033583508004708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
