Cited by 80Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

New Evidence from the East Polynesian Gateway: Substantive and Methodological Results from Aitutaki, Southern Cook Islands

Open access
Allen, Melinda S, Wallace, Rod·2007·Radiocarbon

Abstract

East Polynesia was the geographic terminus of prehistoric human expansion across the globe and the southern Cook Islands, the first archipelago west of Samoa, a gateway to this region. Fourteen new radiocarbon dates from one of the oldest human settlements in this archipelago, the Ureia site (AIT-10) on Aitutaki Island, now indicate occupation from cal AD 1225–1430 (1σ), nearly 300 yr later than previously suggested. Although now among the most securely dated central East Polynesian sites, the new age estimate for Ureia places it outside the settlement period of either the long or short chronology models. The new dates have, however, led to a comfortable fit with the Ureia biological evidence, which suggests not a virgin landscape, but a highly a modified fauna and flora. The results also provide the first systematic demonstration of inbuilt age in tropical Pacific trees, a finding that may explain widely divergent 14 C results from several early East Polynesian sites and has implications for the dating of both island colonization and subsequent intra-island dispersals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200043095

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Class 1 dates included samples on short-lived plant remains and terrestrial avian eggshell, all of which have been shown to produce consistent and reliable ages in the Pacific relative to the target event.

    “Class 1 dates included samples on short-lived plant remains (e.g., twig charcoal or wood, bark, seeds, leaves) and terrestrial avian eggshell, all of which have been shown to produce consistent and reliable ages in the Pacific relative to the target event, i.e., human activity (4, 6, 7, 32).”

    From High-precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid initial human colonization of East Polynesia (2011) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) recommend preferentially dating demonstrably short-lived plant materials, including nutshells, drupes, and branch wood. The Results report more consistent ages for coconut endocarp than for longer-lived wood. Our copy does not establish that terrestrial avian eggshell produces reliable ages, nor does it assess every plant material listed in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Allen MS. 1998. Holocene sea-level change on Aitutaki, Cook Islands: landscape change and human response. Journal of Coastal Research 14(1):10-22.
  2. Bolt R. 2005. Peva: the archaeology of a valley on Ru- rutu, Austral Islands [PhD dissertation]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
  3. Dickinson WR. 2003. Impact of mid-Holocene hydro- isostatic highstand in regional sea level on habitability of islands in Pacific Oceania. Journal of Coastal Re- search 19(3):489-502.
  4. Kirch PV. 2000. On the Roads of the Winds: An Archae- ological History of the Pacific Islands Before Euro- pean Contact. Berkeley: University of California Press. 446 p.
  5. Kirch PV, Flenley JR, Steadman DW, Lamont F, Dawson S. 1992. Ancient environmental degradation. National Geographic Research & Exploration 8(2):166-79.
  6. Parkes A. 1997. Environmental change and the impact of Polynesian colonization: sedimentary records from central Polynesia. In: Kirch PV, Hunt TL, editors. His- torical Ecology in the Pacific Islands. New Haven: Yale University Press. p 166-99.
  7. Steadman DW. 2006. Extinction and Biogeography of Tropical Pacific Birds. Chicago: University of Chi- cago Press. 480 p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, M. S., & Wallace, R.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Allen, Melinda S
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2007
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
1163-1179
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W1482656581
Cited by
80
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
51.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
East Polynesia, Aitutaki, radiocarbon dating, island colonization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review