CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7Chinese history and philosophyHistorical Astronomy and Related StudiesClassical Studies and Philology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Bamboo Annals revisited: problems of method in using the Chronicle as a source for the chronology of early Zhou, Part I

Pankenier, David W.·1992·Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
DOI 10.1017/s0041977x00004626
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The challenge of establishing the chronology of the early Zhou dynasty, especially the date of the Zhou Conquest of Shang, periodically arouses the intense interest of scholars. Down the centuries interest in the general problem has revived whenever advances in calendrical, astronomical, or textual knowledge seemed to offer the promise of a breakthrough. Extraordinary efforts have repeatedly been brought to bear, but until quite recently little progress was achieved in verifying benchmarks prior to 841 B.C., a date already regarded as secure in the time of Sima Qian toward the end of the second century B.C.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0041977x00004626

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Wang, 1950, Book of Odes, 196
  2. Youzeng, 1940, Yi Zhou shu jixin jiaoshi
  3. Pankenier, 1989, Astronomical observation in the Three Dynasties period and the origin of five phases correlative theory, Yinxu bowuyuan yuankan, 1, 183
  4. Tatsuro, 1986, Western Zhou bronze inscriptions and calendars, Tōhō gakuhō, 58, 71
  5. Sunjoo, 1977, Xi Zhou niandaixue shang de ji ge wenti, Dalu zazhi, 15
  6. Fa-kao, 1984, Xi Zhou niandai xin kao, Dalu zazhi, 1
  7. Loewe, 1979, Water, Earth and Fire-the symbols of the Han Dynasty, Nachrichten derGesellschafl für Nalur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens/Hamburg, 125, 63
  8. Pankenier, 1975, Taiping yulan, 84
  9. Li, 1981, Zhonguo tianwen xue shi
  10. ‘The “Current” Bamboo Annals and the date of the Zhou conquest of Shang’, Early China, 11–12, 1985–87, 48–50
  11. Peiyu, 1990, Early China Forum, Early China, 15, 142
  12. Shiming, 1981, Guben zhushu jinian jizheng, 231

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Pankenier, D. W.
Affiliations
Lehigh University (US)
Corresponding author
Pankenier, David W.
ORCID
Pankenier, David W.
Venue
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1992-06
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
272-297
ISSN
  • 0041-977X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0699
DOI
10.1017/s0041977x00004626
OpenAlex
W2077236419
Cited by
7
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 6093 d)
Locations
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
Sima Qian, Chinese chronology, historical source criticism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review