CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7Language, Linguistics, Cultural AnalysisLinguistics, Language Diversity, and IdentityLinguistics and language evolution

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arabic influences on Tigre: A preliminary evaluation

Bulakh, Maria, Kogan, Leonid·2011·Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
DOI 10.1017/s0041977x10000698
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Tigre, an Ethio-Semitic language spoken in Eritrea by a predominantly Muslim population, is known to have remained in intensive contact with Arabic since at least the nineteenth century. In the present article we attempt to survey the lexical and grammatical features of Tigre which are potentially attributable to Arabic influence. The genealogical proximity of Arabic and Ethio-Semitic complicates the task, as borrowed features and common retentions are not always easily distinguishable. In the lexical domain, the Arabic impact is undoubtedly conspicuous: thus, even in the core vocabulary Arabic loanwords are more prominent than in any other Ethio-Semitic language. Nevertheless, for many individual lexemes the borrowing hypothesis remains to be substantiated. Recent Arabic influence is probably responsible for a few relatively superficial features of Tigre phonetics and morphology. Several more deeply-rooted features may in principle be due to a more ancient and more intensive contact with Arabic: the specific influence of the ejectives on the vowels; the grammatical categories of singulative and diminutive; the diversity of verbal noun patterns in the basic stem; and several types of broken plural formation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0041977x10000698

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Moscati, 1964, An Introduction to the Comparative Grammar of the Semitic Languages
  2. Leslau, 1956, Arabica, 3, 266
  3. Leslau, 1941, Documents Tigrigna (Éthiopien Septentrional)
  4. Stein, 2003, Untersuchungen zur Phonologie und Morphologie des Sabäischen
  5. Greenberg, 1991, Semitic Studies in Honor of Wolf Leslau, 577
  6. Raz Shlomo . 1986. “Vowel quantity in Tigre”, in G. Goldenberg (ed.), Ethiopian Studies. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, Tel-Aviv, 14–17 April 1980. Rotterdam and Boston: A. A. Balkema, 455–65.
  7. Elias David L . 2005. “Tigre of Habab. Short grammar and texts from the Rigbat people”, PhD thesis, Harvard University.
  8. Brockelmann, 1913, Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen, II, Syntax
  9. Arnold, 1993, Arabisch–Aramäische Sprachbeziehungen im Qalamūn (Syrien)
  10. Mitchell, 1962, Colloquial Arabic
  11. Naumkin, 1981, Očerki po etnolingvistike Sokotry
  12. Dillmann, 1907, Ethiopic Grammar2
  13. Littmann, 1942, Die Diminutivbildung im Tigrē, Annali del R. Istituto Superiore Orientale di Napoli (nuova serie), 2, 89
  14. Brockelmann, 1908, Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen, I, Laut- und Formlehre
  15. Ullmann, 1989, Das arabische nomen generis
  16. Arnold, 1990, Das Neuwestaramäische, Vol. V, Grammatik
  17. Reinisch, 1893, Die Beḍauye-Sprache in Nordost-Afrika
  18. Leslau, 1945, Short Grammar of Tigré
  19. Raz, 1983, Tigre Grammar and Texts
  20. Reichmuth, 1983, Der arabische Dialekt der Šuhriyya im Ostsudan
  21. Reinisch, 1887, Wörterbuch der Bilin-Sprache
  22. Reinisch, 1895, Wörterbuch der Beḍauye-Sprache
  23. Růžička, 1909, Konsonantische Dissimilation in den semitischen Sprachen
  24. Mahmud [Idris], 2005, Tigre dialects, Journal of Eritrean Studies, 4, 45
  25. Sima, 2000, Tiere, Pflanzen, Steine und Metalle in den altsüdarabischen Inschriften
  26. Simeone-Senelle, 1985, Noms des parties du corps en sudarabique moderne. Première partie: la tête, Matériaux arabes et sudarabiques, 3, 259
  27. Thompson, 1976, The Non-Semitic Languages of Ethiopia, 597
  28. von Soden, 1991, Semitic Studies in Honor of Wolf Leslau, 1488
  29. Praetorius, 1886, Aethiopische Grammatik

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bulakh, M., & Kogan, L.
Affiliations
Russian State University for the Humanities (RU)
Corresponding author
  • Bulakh, Maria
  • Kogan, Leonid
ORCID
Venue
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2011-02
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
1-39
ISSN
  • 0041-977X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0699
DOI
10.1017/s0041977x10000698
OpenAlex
W2113567060
Semantic Scholar
e7fd0c5868e62abe09f4f3f4db653c0660f4007e
Cited by
7
References
49
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 35 d)
Locations
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
Keywords
Tigre language, Arabic influence, language contact, Arabic loanwords, lexical borrowing, phonetic borrowing, morphological borrowing, diminutives, verbal nouns, broken plural

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review