The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mantra and dhāraṇī in the religious traditions of Asia
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking the Category of Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha
Shinohara, K. (2015) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2015.1006841 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Krech, V.
- Affiliations
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Krech, Volkhard
- ORCID
- Krech, Volkhard
- Venue
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-2
- ISSN
- 0041-977X (ISSN-L)
- 1474-0699
- OpenAlex
- W2112580434
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- mantras, dhāraṇī, religious traditions, Asia, Buddhist scriptures, Hindu scripture, Sanskrit texts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
