Cited by 24Political Conflict and GovernanceWar, Law, and JusticePolitical Theory and Democracy

Can Transitional Justice Improve the Quality of Representation in New Democracies?

Ang, Milena, Nalepa, Monika·2019·World Politics

Abstract

Can transitional justice enhance democratic representation in countries recovering from authoritarian rule? The authors argue that lustration, a policy that reveals secret collaboration with the authoritarian regime, can prevent former authoritarian elites from extorting policy concessions from past collaborators who have been elected as politicians in the new regime. Absent lustration, former elites can threaten to reveal information about past collaboration unless the politicians implement policies these elites desire. In this way, lustration policies enable politicians to avoid blackmail and to be responsive to their constituents, improving the quality of representation. The authors show that whether lustration enhances representation depends on its severity and the extent to which dissidents-turned-politicians would suffer if the skeletons in their closets were revealed. The authors also find that the potential to blackmail politicians increases as the ideological distance between authoritarian elites and politicians decreases. They test this theory with original data from the Global Transitional Justice Dataset, which spans eighty-four countries that transitioned to democracy since 1946.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0043887119000066

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Council of Europe originally envisioned lustration use for a decade, after which they should be discontinued because they would no longer be necessary to support CEE's democratic transitions.

    “The Council of europe originally envisioned their use for a decade, after which they should be discontinued because they would no longer be necessary to support Cee's democratic transitions.33”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ang, M., & Nalepa, M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
World Politics
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2019-08-28
Volume
71
Issue
04
Pages
631-666
ISSN
  • 0043-8871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-3338
OpenAlex
W2970183375
Cited by
24
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Politics (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
transitional justice, lustration, democratic representation, authoritarian elites, extortion, political accountability, post-authoritarian democracy, ideological distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review