Can Transitional Justice Improve the Quality of Representation in New Democracies?
Abstract
Can transitional justice enhance democratic representation in countries recovering from authoritarian rule? The authors argue that lustration, a policy that reveals secret collaboration with the authoritarian regime, can prevent former authoritarian elites from extorting policy concessions from past collaborators who have been elected as politicians in the new regime. Absent lustration, former elites can threaten to reveal information about past collaboration unless the politicians implement policies these elites desire. In this way, lustration policies enable politicians to avoid blackmail and to be responsive to their constituents, improving the quality of representation. The authors show that whether lustration enhances representation depends on its severity and the extent to which dissidents-turned-politicians would suffer if the skeletons in their closets were revealed. The authors also find that the potential to blackmail politicians increases as the ideological distance between authoritarian elites and politicians decreases. They test this theory with original data from the Global Transitional Justice Dataset, which spans eighty-four countries that transitioned to democracy since 1946.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Council of Europe originally envisioned lustration use for a decade, after which they should be discontinued because they would no longer be necessary to support CEE's democratic transitions.
“The Council of europe originally envisioned their use for a decade, after which they should be discontinued because they would no longer be necessary to support Cee's democratic transitions.33”
From Contending Temporalities: Stretching the Temporal Reach of Lustration in Central and Eastern Europe (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective
Elster, J. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511607011 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe
Nalepa, M. (2010) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815362 · Cited by 222 · cited 10× · see citing works
“34 See Appendix C in the supplementary material for a detailed description of the data-gathering process; Ang and Nalepa 2019b. 18 world polItIcs ing secret collaboration with the authoritarian regime.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationTransitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union
(2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203887783 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
David, R. (2003) · Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&amp;"/> Social Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00197.x · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Lustration and Transitional Justice: Personnel Systems in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland
David, R. (2011) · University of Pennsylvania Press · doi:10.9783/9780812205763 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Contending Temporalities: Stretching the Temporal Reach of Lustration in Central and Eastern Europe
Horne, C. M. (2024) · East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures · doi:10.1177/08883254231173145 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ang, M., & Nalepa, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Venue
- World Politics
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2019-08-28
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 631-666
- ISSN
- 0043-8871 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3338
- OpenAlex
- W2970183375
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- World Politics (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- transitional justice, lustration, democratic representation, authoritarian elites, extortion, political accountability, post-authoritarian democracy, ideological distance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review