Cited by 535War, Law, and JusticePolitical Conflict and GovernanceMemory, violence, and history

Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective

Elster, Jon·2004·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

An analysis of transitional justice - retribution and reparation after a change of political regime - from Athens in the fifth century BC to the present. Part I, 'The Universe of Transitional Justice', describes more than thirty transitions, some of them in considerable detail, others more succinctly. Part II, 'The Analytics of Transitional Justice', proposes a framework for explaining the variations among the cases - why after some transitions wrongdoers from the previous regime are punished severely and in other cases mildly or not at all, and victims sometimes compensated generously and sometimes poorly or not at all. After surveying a broad range of justifications and excuses for wrongdoings and criteria for selecting and indemnifying victims, the 2004 book concludes with a discussion of three general explanatory factors: economic and political constraints, the retributive emotions, and the play of party politics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511607011

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When all personnel TJ events are pooled, there is no relationship between personnel TJ and time lapsed since transition or year of transition.

    “it appears evident that there is no relationship between personnel TJ and two variables that ought to be good predictors of TJ: time lapsed since transition and year of transition (Elster 2004; Huntington 1991; Barahona de Brito, González-Enríquez, and Aguilar 2001).”
  • TRCs enable peacebuilding and statebuilding to address past wrongs, heal wounded hearts, hold perpetrators of atrocities accountable, and prevent the relapse of future abusive actions.

    “TRCs enable peacebuilding and statebuilding to address past wrongs, heal wounded hearts, hold perpetrators of atrocities accountable, and prevent the relapse of future abusive actions (Elster, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elster, J.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Elster, Jon
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2004-09-06
OpenAlex
W4211159393
Cited by
531
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 20
FWCI
16.89
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, violence, and history
Keywords
transitional justice, retribution, reparations, victim compensation, victim selection, party politics, Athens, judicial history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review