The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry
Abstract
This review highlights the limited amount of research conducted regarding the optimum particle size of different feeds for efficient poultry production. The current industry practice of using highly processed, pelleted diets masks the influence of particle size, but some reports suggest that the effects of feed particle size on performance may be maintained even after pelleting. There appears to be a general consensus that particle sizes of broiler diets based on maize or sorghum, optimum particle size should be between 600 and 900 μm. Available data clearly show that grain particle size is more critical in mash diets than in pelleted or crumble diets. Although it has been postulated that finer grinding increases substrate availability for enzymatic digestion, there is evidence that coarser grinding to a more uniform particle size improves the performance of birds maintained on mash diets. This counter-intuitive effect may result from the positive effect of feed particle size on gizzard development. A more developed gizzard is associated with increased grinding activity, resulting in increased gut motility and greater digestion of nutrients. Although grinding to fine particle size is thought to improve pellet quality, it will markedly increase energy consumption during milling. Systematic investigations on the relationships of feed particle size and diet uniformity with bird performance, gut health and pellet quality are warranted if efficiency is to be optimised in respect of the energy expenditure of grinding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2012-0-02488-x · Cited by 828
Dental Functional Morphology: How Teeth Work
Lucas, P. W. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511735011 · Cited by 550
Wondra, K. J., Hancock, J. D., Behnke, K. C., Hines, R. H., & Stark, C. R. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.733757x · Cited by 349
Engberg, R. M., Hedemann, M. S., & Jensen, B. B. (2002) · British Poultry Science · doi:10.1080/0007166022000004480 · Cited by 340
Effect of oat hulls on performance, gut capacity and feed passage time in broiler chickens
Hetland, H., & Svihus, B. (2001) · British Poultry Science · doi:10.1080/00071660120055331 · Cited by 320
Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides in poultry nutrition
Hetland, H., Choct, M., & Svihus, B. (2004) · World's Poultry Science Journal · doi:10.1079/wps200325 · Cited by 320
Gastrointestinal Anatomy and Physiology
Denbow, D. M. (2015) · Sturkie's Avian Physiology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407160-5.00014-2 · Cited by 269
Effect of ingredients and processing parameters on pellet quality
Briggs, J., Maier, D. E., Watkins, B. A., & Behnke, K. C. (1999) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/78.10.1464 · Cited by 254
Ravindran, V., Hew, L. I., Ravindran, G., & Bryden, W. L. (1999) · British Poultry Science · doi:10.1080/00071669987692 · Cited by 249
Self-citationSvihus, B., Kløvstad, K. H., Perez, V., Zimonja, O., Sahlström, S., Schüller, R. B., Jeksrud, W. K., & Prestløkken, E. (2004) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.08.009 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Amerah, A. M., Ravindran, V., Lentle, R. G., & Thomas, D. G.
- Venue
- World's Poultry Science Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 439-455
- ISSN
- 0043-9339 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-4777
- OpenAlex
- W1972162435
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 13.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0043933907001560
- The paper
- Amerah, A. M., Ravindran, V., Lentle, R. G., & Thomas, D. G. (2007). Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043933907001560
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.