The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs2
Abstract
The effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, carcass characteristics, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology were determined using 160 finishing pigs. The pigs were fed a corn-soybean meal-based diet with the corn milled to particle sizes of 1,000, 800, 600, or 400 microns. The diets were fed in meal or pellet form. Pelleting the diets resulted in 5% greater ADG (P < .01) and 7% greater grain/feed (P < .001). Also, pelleting increased digestibilities of DM, N, and GE by 5 to 8% (P < .001). Reducing particle size increased electrical energy required for milling and decreased milling production rates, especially as particle size was decreased from 600 to 400 microns. Reducing particle size of the corn from 1,000 to 400 microns increased gain/feed by 8% (linear effect, P < .001) and digestibility of GE by 7% (quadratic effect, P < .03). Improved nutrient digestibility and lower ADFI resulted in 26% less daily excretion of DM and 27% less daily excretion of N in the feces as particle size was reduced from 1,000 to 400 microns (linear effects, P < .001). Stomach lesions and keratinization increased with reduced particle size (P < .003) and keratinization increased with pelleting (P < .02), although they were unrelated to growth performance (i.e., gain/feed actually improved as lesion scores increased). Considering milling energy, growth performance, stomach morphology, nutrient digestibility, and nutrient excretion, a particle size of 600 microns, or slightly less, is an acceptable compromise for corn in both meal and pelleted diets for finishing pigs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry
Amerah, A. M., Ravindran, V., Lentle, R. G., & Thomas, D. G. (2007) · World's Poultry Science Journal · doi:10.1017/s0043933907001560 · Cited by 349
Impact of aging on the digestive system related to protein digestion in vivo
Hinssen, F., Mensink, M., Huppertz, T., & van der Wielen, N. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2024.2433598 · Cited by 17
“A smaller particle size, and thus an increased surface area, has been shown to result in an increase in protein digestion of up to 10% in vitro and in pigs (Healy et al. 1994; Lyu et al. 2022; Wondra et al. 1995; Zahir, Fogliano, and Capuano 2018).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wondra, K. J., Hancock, J. D., Behnke, K. C., Hines, R. H., & Stark, C. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 757-763
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2411761398
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1995.733757x
- The paper
- Wondra, K. J., Hancock, J. D., Behnke, K. C., Hines, R. H., & Stark, C. R. (1995). Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs2. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.733757x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.