The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“Sharing time”: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy
Abstract
A discourse-oriented classroom activity in an ethnically mixed, first grade classroom is studied from an interpretive perspective, integrating ethnographic observation and fine-grained conversational analysis. “Sharing time” is a recurring activity where children are called upon to describe an object or give a narrative account about some past event to the entire class. The teacher, through her questions and comments, tries to help the children structure and focus their discourse. This kind of activity serves to bridge the gap between the child's home-based oral discourse competence and the acquisition of literate discourse features required in written communication. Through a detailed characterization of the children's sharing styles, evidence is provided suggesting that children from different backgrounds come to school with different narrative strategies and prosodic conventions for giving narrative accounts. When the child's discourse style matches the teacher's own literate style and expectations, collaboration is rhythmically synchronized and allows for informal practice and instruction in the development of a literate discourse style. For these children, sharing time can be seen as a kind of oral preparation for literacy. In contrast, when the child's narrative style is at variance with the teacher's expectations, collaboration is often unsuccessful and, over time, may adversely affect school performance and evaluation. Sharing time, then, can either provide or deny access to key literacy-related experiences, depending, ironically, on the degree to which teacher and child start out “sharing” a set of discourse conventions and interpretive strategies. (Urban communication, ethnic/subcultural differences in discourse style, the transition to literacy, American English.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Preparing for Culturally Responsive Teaching
Gay, G. (2002) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487102053002003 · Cited by 2,703
How social contexts support and shape language development☆
HOFF, E. (2006) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002 · Cited by 1,853
Autobiographic Narratives as Data in Applied Linguistics
Pavlenko, A. (2007) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amm008 · Cited by 1,015
Analysis of Personal Narratives
Riessman, C. K. (2012) · The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft · doi:10.4135/9781452218403.n26 · Cited by 770
Models of Narrative Analysis: A Typology
Mishler, E. G. (1995) · Journal of Narrative and Life History · doi:10.1075/jnlh.5.2.01mod · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Michaels, S.
- Venue
- Language in Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423-442
- ISSN
- 0047-4045 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8013
- OpenAlex
- W2115632101
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 241.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Sharing time”: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0047404500008861
- The paper
- Michaels, S. (1981). “Sharing time”: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500008861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.