Cited by 2,703Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesGlobal Education and MulticulturalismCritical Race Theory in Education

Preparing for Culturally Responsive Teaching

Gay, Geneva·2002·Journal of Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022487102053002003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gay, G.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Gay, Geneva
Venue
Journal of Teacher Education
Published
2002-03
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
106-116
ISSN
  • 0022-4871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7816
OpenAlex
W4233020791
Cited by
2,703
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 183 · 2025: 269 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 290 · 2022: 250 · 2021: 267 · 2020: 218 · 2019: 218 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 113 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 47
FWCI
52.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Teachers College Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
culturally responsive teaching, teacher preparation, cultural diversity in education, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review