The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the syntax of sentences-in-progress
Abstract
This article describes how it could be possible for two participants engaged in conversation to jointly produce a single syntactic unit such as a sentence. From an inspection of sentence types that are achieved through such joint production, it was determined that participants have available a single utterance construction format. This format, the compound turn-constructional unit format, may be a component of a socially construed syntax-for-conversation. It can be constituted by a wide range of interactionally relevant features of talk in interaction that reveal an emerging utterance as a multiple component turn-constructional unit. The compound turn-constructional unit format is primarily a resource for turn-taking. It can be used to project the next proper place for speaker change. However, it concomitantly provides the resources needed to complete the utterance-in-progress of another participant, thus allowing for the construction of a single sentence across the talk of two speakers. (Conversation, interaction, recognizable activity)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
SCHEGLOFF, E. A., & SACKS, H. (1973) · Semiotica · doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 · Cited by 4,589
(1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665868 · Cited by 4,133
Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology
Psathas, G. (1979) · Human Studies · Cited by 2,349
Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers
Goodwin, C. (1981) · Cited by 2,305
Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking
(1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611810 · Cited by 1,774
Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations.
Duncan, S. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033031 · Cited by 1,385
Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction
(1978) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-11461-4 · Cited by 867
The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation
Goodwin, C. (1979) · Cited by 865
Cited by
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000056 · Cited by 2,678
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (2000) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500001019 · Cited by 1,163
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1996) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.19 · Cited by 1,073
Metadata
- Authors
- Lerner, G. H.
- Venue
- Language in Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 441-458
- ISSN
- 0047-4045 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8013
- OpenAlex
- W2150127701
- Cited by
- 933
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 21.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0047404500016572
- The paper
- Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500016572
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.