Cited by 4,589Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Opening up Closings

SCHEGLOFF, EMANUEL A., SACKS, HARVEY·1973·Semiotica

Abstract

Abstract : The paper presents some of the ways that have been developed for dealing with closings in conversation. Earlier work on conversation formulations of several problems that have been employed to cut into aspects of the data. One may derive an initial problem from a consideration of the most basic features of conversation that are now known of. A partial solution is developed. Problematic aspects of that solution lead to the derivation of another problem which permits the further illumination of the data about closings. After relating the two problems, the paper closes with an attempt to specify the domain for which the closing problems, as they have been posed seem apposite. (Author)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When closings are done by users, they involve multiple strategies such as preclosing or closing-implicative moves and/or providing an account.

    “When closings are done by users, they involve multiple strategies such as the inclusion of preclosing or closing-implicative moves (e.g., 'okay', see also Schegloff and Sacks 1973) and/or providing an account (e.g., 'I have to go', Licoppe and Rollet 2020).”
  • The 'problem of closings' may relate to some of the many issues of miscommunication in human-AI interaction documented in the corpus of EM/CA studies.

    “This 'problem of closings' (Schegloff and Sacks 1973: 292) may relate to some of the many issues of miscommunication in human-AI interaction documented in our corpus of EM/CA studies.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SCHEGLOFF, E. A., & SACKS, H.
Venue
Semiotica
Published
1973
Volume
8
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0037-1998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-3692
OpenAlex
W2068687198
Cited by
4,589
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 150 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 194 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 229 · 2019: 187 · 2018: 211 · 2017: 177 · 2016: 285 · 2015: 252 · 2014: 187 · 2013: 121 · 2012: 143
FWCI
56.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Semiotica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Keywords
closing, conversation analysis, turn-taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review