The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions
Abstract
This article illustrates how the notions of style and indexicality can illuminate understanding of the social meaning of a specific linguistic variable, the tag question. Drawing on conversational speech and ethnographic data from a community of high school girls in northwest England, it quantitatively and qualitatively examines the discourse, grammatical, and phonological design of tag questions in this community. Members of four social groups are shown to use tag questions to similar effect, as a means of conducing particular points of view. However, these groups also exhibit striking differences in the stylistic composition of tags, distinctions that indexically construct stances and personas, which may in turn come to represent group identity. These data suggest that the social meaning of tag questions can be best ascertained by examining their internal composition and by situating them in their broader discursive and social stylistic contexts. (Adolescents, ethnography, indexicality, interactional context, quantitative discourse analysis, social meaning, style, tag questions)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Cited by 28,356
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
Wenger, E. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803932 · Cited by 23,500
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs.
Hagan, J., & Willis, P. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2077050 · Cited by 5,735
(1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,644
Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445605054407 · Cited by 3,797 · cited 4×
“In the current study, the indexical values of tag questions can come to index a group persona through the process of stance accretion (Du Bois 2002; Rauniomaa 2003 , both cited in Bucholtz & Hall 2005 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIndexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life
Silverstein, M. (2003) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00013-2 · Cited by 3,744
Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy
Appadurai, A. (1990) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/026327690007002017 · Cited by 3,616
Lakoff, R. (1973) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500000051 · Cited by 3,138
Language style as audience design
Bell, A. (1984) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s004740450001037x · Cited by 2,904
Cited by
Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation
Eckert, P. (2012) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 · Cited by 896
“Helping You to Pay Us”: Rapport Management in Debt Collection Call Centre Encounters
Harrington, L. (2018) · Journal of Politeness Research · doi:10.1515/pr-2018-0013 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- MOORE, E., & PODESVA, R.
- Venue
- Language in Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 447-485
- ISSN
- 0047-4045 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8013
- OpenAlex
- W2119752956
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 63.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0047404509990224
- The paper
- MOORE, E., & PODESVA, R. (2009). Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404509990224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.