The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study
Abstract
To examine changes in semantic memory organization and use during aging, we recorded event-related potentials as younger and older adults listened to sentences ending with the expected word, an unexpected word from the same semantic category, or an unexpected word from a different category. Half of the contexts were highly constraining. In both groups, expected words elicited less negativity 300-500 ms (N400) than unexpected ones, and unexpected words elicited smaller N400s when these were categorically related. Whereas younger adults showed the greatest N400 reduction to unexpected but related words in high constraint contexts, older adults showed the opposite tendency. Thus, unlike younger adults, older adults as a group do not seem to be using context predictively. Older adults with higher verbal fluency and larger vocabularies, however, showed the younger response pattern, suggesting resource availability may offset certain age-related changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x · Cited by 3,321
Does the capacity of working memory change with age?
Wingfield, A., Stine, E. A. L., Lahar, C. J., & Aberdeen, J. S. (1988) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610738808259731 · Cited by 257
Cited by
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults
Shao, Z., Janse, E., Visser, K., & Meyer, A. S. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00772 · Cited by 905
Four central questions about prediction in language processing
Huettig, F. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014 · Cited by 405
fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension
Shain, C., Blank, I. A., van Schijndel, M., Schuler, W., & Fedorenko, E. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107307 · Cited by 215
Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals
Zirnstein, M., van Hell, J. G., & Kroll, J. F. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.001 · Cited by 84
Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension
Hubbard, R. J., & Federmeier, K. D. (2021) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147466 · Cited by 35
Self-citationComparing semantic fluency in American sign language and English
Sehyr, Z. S., Giezen, M. R., & Emmorey, K. (2018) · The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education · doi:10.1093/deafed/eny013 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., de Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-146
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140475149
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
