Cited by 9Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and HistoryClassical Antiquity StudiesHistorical Geography and Cartography

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

‘II.—Topography: South-Eastern Laconia

Open access
Wace, A. J. B., Hasluck, F. W.·1908·The Annual of the British School at Athens

Abstract

The following paper deals with the historical geography and antiquities of the south-eastern promontory of Laconia from Acriae on the Laconic Gulf to Epidaurus Limera. Most of the country included being within easy reach of the sea, the ‘periplus’ arrangement has been followed, and a concordance of ancient geographers is prefixed to each of the sections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0068245400003191

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Figurine 11 and its comparanda are so distinctive and similar that they can quite confidently be considered matching moulds.

    “In fact,  and its comparanda (Wace -, , fig.:; AO, pls CLXXXII:, CXC:) are so distinctive within the corpus and so similar to one another that they can quite confidently be considered matching moulds.”

    From LEAD FIGURINES FROM THE SANCTUARY OF ARTEMIS ORTHIA AT SPARTA IN THE ART GALLERY OF GREATER VICTORIA (CANADA): PROBLEMS OF TYPOLOGY AND COLLECTIONS HISTORY (2022) · cites this paper as Wace 1908-9, 128, fig.6:23

    The passages from BOEAE. describe marble sculptures, while DEMONIA. mentions terracotta statuettes only in passing; neither identifies the cited figurine or compares moulds. Searches for fig. 6:23, page 128, and matching figurine moulds found no passage in our copy that addresses the claim. The available passages have no page labels. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The mould associated with figurine 38 appears in levels attributed to Lead I through Lead III-IV and can only be assigned by stylistic comparison to a chronological range spanning c. 650-500 BCE.

    “The mould associated with the figurine appears in levels attributed to Lead I through Lead III-IV and, therefore, can only be assigned by stylistic comparison to a chronological range spanning c. - BCE (cf.Wace -, , fig.:; AO, pls CLXXXI:, CXC:; Cavanagh and Laxton , pl.:.).”

    From LEAD FIGURINES FROM THE SANCTUARY OF ARTEMIS ORTHIA AT SPARTA IN THE ART GALLERY OF GREATER VICTORIA (CANADA): PROBLEMS OF TYPOLOGY AND COLLECTIONS HISTORY (2022) · cites this paper as Wace 1908-9, 136, fig.9:22

    The BOEAE. and DEMONIA sections describe statues and terracotta statuettes, but do not identify the claimed mould or figurine. Searches for Lead I–III-IV, the mould, and the c. 650–500 BCE stylistic date found no passage addressing them. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Ross, Wanderungen, ii, 247
  2. Leake, Marea, i, 225
  3. Tozer, J.H.S., iv, 233
  4. Niese, 1906, Nachrichten Kgl. Ges. d. Wiss. zu Göttingen, 114
  5. Bas, 1845, Rev. Arch., 220
  6. Curtius, Peloponnes, ii, 289
  7. Bas, 1845, Rev. Arch., 218
  8. Leake, Morea, i, 510
  9. Coronelli, 1686, Mémoires du Roy. de Morée, 100
  10. Sathas, Mon. Hist. Hell., vi, 254
  11. Bas, 1845, Rev. Arch., 219
  12. Leake, 1805, Morea, i, 203
  13. Bursian, op. cit., ii, 142
  14. Pagnini, Della Decima di Firenze, iv, 221
  15. Leake, Morea, i, 217
  16. Sathas, Mon. Hist. Hell., iv, 232
  17. Sathas, Mon. Hell., vi, 85
  18. Curtius, op. cit., ii, 290
  19. Leake, Morea, i, 224
  20. Leake, Morea, i, 200
  21. Négris, 1904, Ath. Mitt., 344
  22. Winter, Terrakotten, i, 217
  23. Bursian, Geogr. Griechenlands, ii, 143
  24. Curtius, op. cit., ii, 294
  25. Treu, 1880, Arch. Zeit., VI
  26. Miklosich, Res. Gr. et Ital., 301, 304
  27. Boetticher, 1878, Malvasia, 33
  28. Bosio, 1st. delia S.R. di S. Giov. Gieros., xxiii, 479
  29. Nani, Hist. Rep. Ven., ii, 401
  30. Leake, Morea, i, 204
  31. Bursian, op. cit., ii, 112
  32. Charrière, Nég. de la France, i, 371

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wace, A. J. B., & Hasluck, F. W.
Venue
The Annual of the British School at Athens
Published
1908-11
Volume
14
Pages
161-182
ISSN
  • 0068-2454 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-2403
OpenAlex
W2328631569
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annual of the British School at Athens (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
Keywords
Laconia, historical geography, antiquities, Epidaurus, ancient geographers, ancient topography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review