Cited by 330Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity StudiesAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and History

Villages, land and population in Graeco-Roman Egypt

Rathbone, D. W.·1990·Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society

Abstract

The aim of this paper, which is what scientists would call a ‘working paper’, is to provide some orientation and ideas for future research on the level and distribution of population in Graeco-Roman Egypt. A traditional concern of historians has been to fix the size of the total population. On the shaky basis of an incidental figure in Josephus and a doctored passage of Diodorus Siculus, this is conventionally pitched, for the most prosperous periods of Ptolemaic and Roman domination, in the range of 8 to 10 million. In section 1 of this paper I discuss the literary sources at some length, not because of their value but in the hope of ending misleading citation of them. In the more positive section 2 I use general considerations and what documentary evidence we have to argue instead for a population in the Graeco-Roman period of from around 3 million to a maximum of 5 million. Such vague total estimates, however, are of limited value. They serve as an introduction to and as parameters for the more historically interesting questions of relative increases and decreases over time, and of the density and distribution of population in relation to other socio-economic factors such as the quantity and type of land under cultivation, the prevailing agricultural regime, the scale of urbanisation, elite exploitation through taxes and rents, and the standard of living of the rural population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0068673500005253

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Fayum saw substantial population growth during the first hundred years of Ptolemaic rule, presumably as a result of Greek immigration.

    “Abusir el-Meleq's proximity to, and close ties with, the Fayum are significant in the context of this study as the Fayum in particular saw a substantial growth in its population during the first hundred years of Ptolemaic rule, presumably as a result of Greek immigration3343.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rathbone, D. W.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rathbone, D. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society
Published
1990
Volume
36
Pages
103-142
ISSN
  • 0068-6735 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-5899
OpenAlex
W2099018878
Cited by
330
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 21
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Keywords
population estimates, Greek-Roman Egypt, Ptolemaic Egypt, Roman Egypt, rural villages, land under cultivation, agricultural regime, urbanization, Josephus, Diodorus Siculus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review