Cited by 2,235

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering

Behrensmeyer, Anna K.·1978·Paleobiology

Abstract

Bones of recent mammals in the Amboseli Basin, southern Kenya, exhibit distinctive weathering characteristics that can be related to the time since death and to the local conditions of temperature, humidity and soil chemistry. A categorization of weathering characteristics into six stages, recognizable on descriptive criteria, provides a basis for investigation of weathering rates and processes. The time necessary to achieve each successive weathering stage has been calibrated using known-age carcasses. Most bones decompose beyond recognition in 10 to 15 yr. Bones of animals under 100 kg and juveniles appear to weather more rapidly than bones of large animals or adults. Small-scale rather than widespread environmental factors seem to have greatest influence on weathering characteristics and rates. Bone weathering is potentially valuable as evidence for the period of time represented in recent or fossil bone assemblages, including those on archeological sites, and may also be an important tool in censusing populations of animals in modern ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0094837300005820

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Western, 1973, The structure, dynamics and changes of the Amboseli ecosystem, 385
  2. Toots, 1965, Sequence of disarticulation in mammalian skeletons, Contrib. Geol., 4, 37
  3. Behrensmeyer, 1975, The Taphonomy and paleoecology of Plio-Pleistocene vertebrate assemblages of Lake Rudolf, Kenya, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 146, 473
  4. Binford, 1977, For Theory Building in Archeology, 77
  5. 10.1038/241104a0 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/278350 · DOI
  7. Voorhies, 1969, Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska, 69
  8. Behrensmeyer A. K. and Dechant D. E. In prep. The recent bones of Amboseli Park, Kenya in relation to East African Paleoecology. To be in: Behrensmeyer A. K. and Hill A. , eds. Fossils in the Making. In Prep. (Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological research symposium 69.)
  9. 10.1016/0033-5894(77)90071-0 · DOI
  10. Hill, 1975, Taphonomy of contemporary and late Cenozoic East African vertebrates, 331
  11. Isaac, 1967, Towards the interpretation of occupation debris: some experiments and observations. The Kroeber Anthropol, Soc. Pap., 37, 31
  12. Shipman, 1977, Paleoecology, taphonomic history, and population dynamics of the vertebrate fossil assemblage from middle Miocene deposits exposed at Fort Ternan, Kenya
  13. Brain, 1967, Bone weathering and the problem of bone pseudotools, South Afr. J. Sci., 63, 97
  14. Rickleffs, 1973, Ecology, 861
  15. Hare, 1974, Amino acid dating of bone—the influence of water, Carnegie Inst. of Washington Year Book., 73, 576

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Behrensmeyer, A. K.
Venue
Paleobiology
Published
1978
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
150-162
ISSN
  • 0094-8373
  • 1938-5331
Cited by
2,235
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review