The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxa
Abstract
The incompleteness of the fossil record hinders the inference of evolutionary rates and patterns. Here, we derive relationships among true taxonomic durations, preservation probability, and observed taxonomic ranges. We use these relationships to estimate original distributions of taxonomic durations, preservation probability, and completeness (proportion of taxa preserved), given only the observed ranges. No data on occurrences within the ranges of taxa are required. When preservation is random and the original distribution of durations is exponential, the inference of durations, preservability, and completeness is exact. However, reasonable approximations are possible given non-exponential duration distributions and temporal and taxonomic variation in preservability. Thus, the approaches we describe have great potential in studies of taphonomy, evolutionary rates and patterns, and genealogy. Analyses of Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician trilobite species, Paleozoic crinoid genera, Jurassic bivalve species, and Cenozoic mammal species yield the following results: (1) The preservation probability inferred from stratigraphic ranges alone agrees with that inferred from the analysis of stratigraphic gaps when data on the latter are available. (2) Whereas median durations based on simple tabulations of observed ranges are biased by stratigraphic resolution, our estimates of median duration, extinction rate, and completeness are not biased. (3) The shorter geologic ranges of mammalian species relative to those of bivalves cannot be attributed to a difference in preservation potential. However, we cannot rule out the contribution of taxonomic practice to this difference. (4) In the groups studied, completeness (proportion of species [trilobites, bivalves, mammals] or genera [crinoids] preserved) ranges from 60% to 90%. The higher estimates of completeness at smaller geographic scales support previous suggestions that the incompleteness of the fossil record reflects loss of fossiliferous rock more than failure of species to enter the fossil record in the first place.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Savitzky-Golay Smoothing Filters
Press, W. H., & Teukolsky, S. A. (1990) · Computers in Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4822961 · Cited by 11,670
Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism
Eldredge, N., Gould, S. J., & Schöpf, T. J. M. (1972) · Cited by 3,257
Valen, L. M. V. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,448
THE MAJOR FEATURES OF EVOLUTION
Olson, E. C. (1954) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1954.tb00114.x · Cited by 2,026
The Major Features of Evolution
Simpson, G. G. (1953) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/simp93764 · Cited by 2,008
Calibrating Rates of Early Cambrian Evolution
Bowring, S. A., Grotzinger, J. P., Isachsen, C. E., Knoll, A. H., Pelechaty, S. M., & Kolosov, P. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.11539488 · Cited by 526
Systematics and the Fossil Record: documenting evolutionary patterns
Smith, A. B. (1994) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444313918 · Cited by 456
Sparks, B. W., & Shaw, A. B. (1965) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1794238 · Cited by 449
Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: an interpretation
Raup, D. M. (1976) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300004929 · Cited by 379
Self-citationThe adequacy of the fossil record
Donovan, S. K., & PAUL, C. R. C. (1998) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 377
Cited by
Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?
Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J. L., Lindsey, E. L., Maguire, K. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09678 · Cited by 4,400
Extinction Vulnerability and Selectivity: Combining Ecological and Paleontological Views
McKinney, M. L. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.495 · Cited by 1,008
Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction
De Vos, J. M., Joppa, L. N., Gittleman, J. L., Stephens, P. R., & Pimm, S. L. (2015) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12380 · Cited by 675
Cope's Rule and the Dynamics of Body Mass Evolution in North American Fossil Mammals
Alroy, J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.731 · Cited by 539
Bayesian Total-Evidence Dating Reveals the Recent Crown Radiation of Penguins
Gavryushkina, A., Heath, T. A., Ksepka, D. T., Stadler, T., Welch, D., & Drummond, A. J. (2016) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syw060 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Foote, M., & Raup, D. M.
- Venue
- Paleobiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-140
- ISSN
- 0094-8373 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5331
- OpenAlex
- W1936619567
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 17.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0094837300016134
- The paper
- Foote, M., & Raup, D. M. (1996). Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxa. Paleobiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300016134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.