The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability
Abstract
According to a “selective” (as opposed to “instructive”) model of human language capacity, people come to know more than they experience. The discrepancy between experience and eventual capacity (the “poverty of the stimulus”) is bridged by genetically provided information. Hence any hypothesis about the linguistic genotype (or “Universal Grammar,” UG) has consequences for what experience is needed and what form people's mature capacities (or “grammars”) will take. This BBS target article discusses the “trigger experience,” that is, the experience that actually affects a child's linguistic development. It is argued that this must be a subset of a child's total linguistic experience and hence that much of what a child hears has no consequence for the form of the eventual grammar. UG filters experience and provides an upper bound on what constitutes the triggering experience. This filtering effect can often be seen in the way linguistic capacity can change between generations. Children only need access to robust structures of minimal (“degree-0”) complexity. Everything can be learned from simple, unembedded “domains” (a grammatical concept involved in defining an expression's logical form). Children do not need access to more complex structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Valiant, L. G. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1968.1972 · Cited by 3,279
Cited by
Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01230-3 · Cited by 1,299
White, L. (1991) · Interlanguage studies bulletin (Utrecht) · doi:10.1177/026765839100700205 · Cited by 708
Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00043521 · Cited by 520
A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition
MACWHINNEY, B. (2004) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000904006336 · Cited by 297
The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology
Anderson, S. R., & Lightfoot, D. W. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613869 · Cited by 149
Self-citationReconsidering the Role of Interaction and Input in Second Language Acquisition
Braidi, S. M. (1995) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00965.x · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Lightfoot, D.
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 321-334
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2019730309
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.