Cited by 11Paranormal Experiences and BeliefsReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Parapsychology is science, but its findings are inconclusive

Akers, Charles·1987·Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x00054480

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akers, C.
Affiliations
Institut Des Substances et Organismes de la Mer (FR)
Corresponding author
Akers, Charles
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
1987-12
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
566-568
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
OpenAlex
W1986307218
Cited by
11
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
parapsychology, paranormal phenomena, inconclusive evidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review