The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Evaluation of Companion Pets with Elderly Psychiatric Patients
Abstract
The main aim of this study was to evaluate pet therapy in terms of increased interaction with two groups of elderly psychiatric patients. These patients were different in respect of their diagnosis, but their environments were similar in layout, decor and facilities. Each group of patients was observed by an independent observer, and further rated by the ward nurses on a scale which recorded change in their behaviour over the three conditions: baseline, dog intervention and photographic intervention. The total time of observing was four weeks where the baseline (i.e. “normal” amount of interaction) and the two intervening stimuli were introduced, and compared with one another. Time sampling was used throughout the study. The results indicate that the dog intervention was the most effective in increasing interaction when comparisons were made with other conditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Importantly, four studies included in the review compared aaIs with active interventions rather than a wait-list control group, demonstrating that aaI was as effective as the alternative intervention, and in some cases more effective (holcomb and meacham 1989; haughie, milne and Elliot 1992; Bernstein, Friedmann and malaspina 2000;marr et al. 2000).”
From A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Psychosocial Outcomes (2015) · cites this paper as haughie, milne and Elliot 1992
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Mugford, 1975, Pet Animals and Society
- Elliott, 1991, Patients' best friend, Nursing Times, 87, 6
- Katcher, 1983, New Perspective on Our Life with Companion Animals
- 10.1093/geront/19.4.368 · DOI · Paper page
- Hendy, 1984, The Pet Connection
- 10.2466/pr0.1982.50.1.71 · DOI
- Corson, 1975, Current Psychiatric Therapies 15, 277
- 10.1016/S0010-440X(77)80008-4 · DOI
- Drabman, 1979, Assessing generalisation with children: a generalisation map, Behavioural Assessment, 6, 203
- McCulloch, 1980, New Perspective on Our Life with Companion Animals
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beetz, A., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Julius, H., & Kotrschal, K. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234 · Cited by 904
“Cardiovascular disease and human-animal interaction Evidence for the effects of HAI on cardiovascular diseases was gained from the following studies: Headey (1999) found that dog and cat owners were less likely to take medication for heart problems than non-pet owners.”
InfluentialAnimal-Assisted Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
Nimer, J., & Lundahl, B. (2007) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279307x224773 · Cited by 712
Maujean, A., Pepping, C. A., & Kendall, E. (2015) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279315x14129350721812 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Haughie, E., Milne, D., & Elliott, V.
- Affiliations
- St George's Park (GB)
- Venue
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-372
- ISSN
- 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1833
- OpenAlex
- W2090535077
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Keywords
- animal-assisted therapy, companion animals, dogs, elderly psychiatric patients, mental disorders in older adults, human-animal interaction, social interaction, photographic intervention, temporal sampling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
