The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cross-linguistic variations in L2 morphological awareness
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of L1 processing experience on L2 morphological awareness. Preliminary cross-linguistic comparisons indicated that morphological awareness in two typologically distinct languages, Chinese and English, differs in several major ways. Based on the comparisons, three specific hypotheses were formulated: compared with learners with a typologically similar L1 background, Chinese learners of English as an L2 would be less sensitive to intraword structural salience, less efficient in structural analysis, and more adept at integrating word-internal (morphological) and word-external (context) information. These hypotheses were tested empirically with two groups of adult L2 learners of English with contrasting L1 backgrounds (Chinese and Korean). The data demonstrated that virtually no difference existed between the two ESL groups in their intraword structural sensitivity, and that, although Chinese learners were notably slower than Korean learners in performing intraword structural analysis, they were far more efficient in integrating morphological and contextual information during sentence processing. Viewed collectively, these findings seem to suggest that L1 processing experience influences the development of L2 morphological awareness in specific and predictable ways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction
(2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839089 · Cited by 916
The Effects of First Language Orthographic Features on Second Language Reading in Text
Akamatsu, N. (2003) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00216 · Cited by 122
Advantages of Bilinguals Over Monolinguals in Learning a Third Language
Abu-Rabia, S., & Sanitsky, E. (2010) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2010.502797 · Cited by 111
Role of Phonological and Morphological Awareness in L2 Oral Word Reading
Schiff, R., & Calif, S. (2007) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00409.x · Cited by 79
Cross-linguistic transfer of morphological awareness between Chinese and English
Ke, S., & Xiao, F. (2015) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2015.1114624 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- KODA, K.
- Venue
- Applied Psycholinguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-320
- ISSN
- 0142-7164 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1817
- OpenAlex
- W2134725397
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-linguistic variations in L2 morphological awareness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0142716400003015
- The paper
- KODA, K. (2000). Cross-linguistic variations in L2 morphological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400003015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.