Cited by 42Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Cross-linguistic transfer of morphological awareness between Chinese and English

Ke, Sihui, Xiao, Feng·2015·Language Awareness

Abstract

Substantial biliteracy research on two alphabetic languages has indicated that, once it is fostered in the first language (L1) literacy experience, morphological awareness can transfer and facilitate second language (L2) reading. It is still unclear, however, whether L1 metalinguistic awareness transfers in the same manner across typologically different languages, and to what extent and under what conditions transfer occurs. This paper synthesises eight studies on the transfer of morphological awareness between Chinese and English. Three questions guided this research: (1) how was morphological awareness defined and measured in prior work; (2) what are the patterns of transfer between the two languages; and (3) what are the factors that affect such transfer effects? The findings have shown a lack of consistency in measuring morphological awareness in existing studies; there were small-to-moderate correlations between L1 and L2 morphological awareness in Chinese–English bilingual reading development; and L2 exposure and task demands were shown to have notable impacts on the cross-linguistic transfer. It is suggested that much needs to be done to expand our understanding of how morphological awareness functions as a sharable resource in bilingual reading development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658416.2015.1114624

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Morphological compounding can be transferred between Chinese and English.

    “The results of path analyses show that morphological compounding can be transferred between Chinese and English, supporting the interdependence hypothesis (Cummins, 1979 ) and echoing the previous findings (Ke & Xiao, 2015; Lin et al., 2018 ; Xie et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ke, S., & Xiao, F.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Pomona College (US)
Corresponding author
Ke, Sihui
Venue
Language Awareness
Published
2015-10-02
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
355-380
ISSN
  • 0965-8416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7565
OpenAlex
W2173573468
Cited by
41
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Awareness (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pomona College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
morphological awareness, language transfer, Chinese-English bilingualism, second language reading, metalinguistic awareness, biliteracy, L1-L2 transfer, L2 exposure, task demands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review