Development of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in Spanish-speaking language minority learners: A parallel process latent growth curve model
Abstract
Despite acknowledgement of the limited English vocabularies demonstrated by many language minority (LM) learners, few studies have identified skills that relate to variation in vocabulary growth in this population. This study investigated the concurrent development of morphological awareness (i.e., students’ understanding of complex words as combinations of meaningful smaller units) and vocabulary for LM learners in early adolescence. A cohort of Spanish-speaking LM learners (n = 90) was followed from fourth through seventh grade and assessed annually. Latent growth modeling results indicated a strong relationship between rates of growth in the two skills, such that learners with rapid growth in derivational morphological awareness also demonstrated rapid growth in vocabulary. Despite positive vocabulary growth during this period, the learners remained far below national norms. Findings highlight the need for language-focused instructional intervention for this population and suggest that morphological awareness may be a promising point of leverage for such instruction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For L2 readers, lexical inferencing is a crucial skill to extend their vocabulary.
“For them, lexical inferencing is a crucial skill to extend their vocabulary (Kieffer & Lesaux, 2012a).”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Kieffer & Lesaux, 2012a
Cited by
Sorted by citations
KIEFFER, M. J., BIANCAROSA, G., & MANCILLA-MARTINEZ, J. (2013) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716411000920 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationCrosson, A. C., McKeown, M. G., Moore, D. W., & Ye, F. (2019) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9885-y · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2
Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10122-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Khan, A. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03610-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Explicit teaching of the words ’ internal structure in foreign languages helps improve the EFL learners ’ fl uency in reading and editing skills (Khan, 2022; Badawi, 2019).”
Influential
- Authors
- KIEFFER, M. J., & LESAUX, N. K.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- KIEFFER, MICHAEL J.
- Venue
- Applied Psycholinguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-04-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-54
- ISSN
- 0142-7164 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1817
- OpenAlex
- W2159252474
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Psycholinguistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- morphological awareness, vocabulary development, Spanish-speaking students, derivational morphology, early adolescence, vocabulary knowledge, bilingual education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review