Cited by 105Second Language Acquisition and LearningReading and Literacy DevelopmentEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Roles of morphological awareness in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking language minority learners: Exploring partial mediation by vocabulary and reading fluency

Open access
KIEFFER, MICHAEL J., BIANCAROSA, GINA, MANCILLA-MARTINEZ, JEANNETTE·2013·Applied Psycholinguistics

Abstract

This study investigated the direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness reading comprehension for Spanish-speaking language minority learners reading in English. Multivariate path analysis was used to investigate the unique contribution of derivational morphological awareness to reading comprehension as well as its indirect contributions via three hypothesized mediators for students in sixth, seventh, and eighth grade (N= 101). Results indicated a significant unique contribution of morphological awareness, controlling for phonemic decoding, listening comprehension, reading vocabulary, word reading fluency, and passage reading fluency. Results further indicated significant indirect contributions of morphological awareness via reading vocabulary and passage fluency, but not via word reading fluency. Findings suggest that morphological awareness may play multiple important roles in second-language reading comprehension.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0142716411000920

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [7]7. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Billingsley, F., & Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain. (pp. 383-415). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
  2. [71]71. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford Press.
  3. [79]79. Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-4; 4th ed.). Toronto: Psychological Corporation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KIEFFER, M. J., BIANCAROSA, G., & MANCILLA-MARTINEZ, J.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
KIEFFER, MICHAEL J.
Venue
Applied Psycholinguistics
Published
2012-02-20
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
697-725
ISSN
  • 0142-7164 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1817
OpenAlex
W2156432665
Cited by
105
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Applied Psycholinguistics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Spencer Foundation
  • William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
morphological awareness, derivational morphology, reading comprehension, English as a second language, reading vocabulary, reading fluency, word reading fluency, mediation, second language reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review