The effect of pause location on perceived fluency
Abstract
Speech disfluency in first language (L1) and second language (L2) is not only quantitatively different (e.g., number and length of pauses) but also qualitatively different (e.g., distribution of pauses); however, how pause distributions in L1 and L2 affect judgments of perceived fluency is unclear. The study examined the relationship between pause phenomena and perceived fluency using two experiments. Experiment 1 investigated the relative contributions of frequency, length, and distribution of silent pauses to perceived fluency of L2 speech. Experiment 2 tested causal effects of pause location on perceived fluency of L1 and L2 speech using phonetic manipulations. Findings suggest a significant role of pause location in perceived fluency. In Experiment 1, silent pause rate within a clause demonstrated the strongest correlation with L2 fluency ratings, and in Experiment 2, perceived fluency of L1 and L2 speech was influenced by pause location. The findings suggest that listeners seem to be sensitive to pause location and to understand that pauses within clauses tend to reflect reduced cognitive fluency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pause location (mid- vs. final clauses) may be indicative of different cognitive processes.
“Second, in breakdown fluency, pause location (mid-vs.final clauses) may be indicative of different cognitive processes (Kahng, 2018).”
From MASSED TASK REPETITION IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT (2022) · cites this paper as Kahng, 2018
Cites
Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners
Kormos, J., & Dénes (2004) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Suzuki, Y. (2021) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12433 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
MASSED TASK REPETITION IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT
Suzuki, Y., & Hanzawa, K. (2022) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263121000358 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Second, in breakdown fluency, pause location (mid- vs. final clauses) may be indicative of different cognitive processes (Kahng, 2018).”
Background
- Authors
- KAHNG, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Northern Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- KAHNG, JIMIN
- ORCID
- KAHNG, JIMIN
- Venue
- Applied Psycholinguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-11-23
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 569-591
- ISSN
- 0142-7164 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1817
- OpenAlex
- W2769255162
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Psycholinguistics (publishedVersion)
- UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Michigan State University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
- Keywords
- disfluency, perceived fluency, silent pauses, second language speech, pause frequency, pause duration, clause boundaries, processing fluency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review