Cited by 679EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningPhonetics and Phonology ResearchSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners

Kormos, Judit, Dénes,, Mariann·2004·System

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kormos, J., & Dénes
Affiliations
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Corresponding author
Kormos, Judit
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
145-164
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028810396
Cited by
679
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
FWCI
43.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • System (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
fluency, second language speech, teacher perceptions, Hungarian as a second language, speech rate, mean length of utterance, lexical diversity, accuracy, pauses, disfluency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review