The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
National Adaptation to European Integration: The Importance of Institutional Veto Points
Open accessAbstract
The repercussions of European integration on national policymaking have increasingly drawn scholarly attention, yet, the determinants of national adaptation to the European Union are still poorly understood. This article takes issue with evolving arguments which grant crucial importance to the “goodness of fit” between European provisions and national rules and practices for explaining the degree of national adjustment to European requirements. In the case of the implementation of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, the country with the greatest misfit, the United Kingdom, adapted more successfully than the country which only needed incremental adjustments, Germany. The German record was also worse than the Dutch, despite the higher adaptation pressure of the latter. The case study suggests that the number of institutional veto points that central governments has to face when imposing European provisions on their constituencies, ultimately tend to shape the pace and quality of implementation, regardless of differential degrees in the goodness of fit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tsebelis, G. (1995) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400007225 · Cited by 2,605
Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies
Kitschelt, H. P. (1986) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712340000380x · Cited by 2,563
THE JOINT‐DECISION TRAP: LESSONS FROM GERMAN FEDERALISM AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
SCHARPF, F. W. (1988) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.x · Cited by 1,965
THE TRANSFORMATION OF GOVERNANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
(1999) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203279625 · Cited by 878
Trading up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy
Mitchell, S. K., & Vogel, D. (1996) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061329 · Cited by 822
Weale, A. (1991) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 769
Policy Styles in Western Europe
Richardson, J. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 746
Trading up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy
Cooper, R. N., & Vogel, D. (1995) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20047393 · Cited by 730
Health Politics, Interests and Institutions in Western Europe
Rodwin, V. G., & Immergut, E. M. (1995) · Journal of Public Health Policy · doi:10.2307/3342982 · Cited by 662
Sweet, A. S., & Brunell, T. L. (1998) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585929 · Cited by 484
Cited by
The Europeanization of Public Policy
Radaelli, C. M. (2003) · The Politics of Europeanization · doi:10.1093/0199252092.003.0002 · Cited by 1,049
Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2003) · The Politics of Europeanization · doi:10.1093/0199252092.003.0003 · Cited by 835
Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU‐15 Compared to New Member States*
FALKNER, G., & TREIB, O. (2008) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00777.x · Cited by 395
Obstinate and Inefficient: Why Member States Do Not Comply With European Law
Börzel, T. A., Hofmann, T., Panke, D., & Sprungk, C. (2010) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414010376910 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Haverland, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Policy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-103
- ISSN
- 0143-814X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7815
- OpenAlex
- W1991257939
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 96.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Adaptation to European Integration: The Importance of Institutional Veto Points. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0143814x00000763
- The paper
- Haverland, M. (2000). National Adaptation to European Integration: The Importance of Institutional Veto Points. Journal of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00000763
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.