The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU‐15 Compared to New Member States*
Abstract
Starting from the findings of an earlier compliance study covering the 15 ‘old’ Member States of the European Union, which identified three ‘worlds of compliance’, this article seeks to establish whether or not the new Member States from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) represent a separate world of compliance. We present empirical findings from a research project on the implementation of three EU Directives from the field of working time and equal treatment in four CEE countries. The evidence suggests that the new Member States display implementation styles that are similar to a few countries in the EU‐15. The expectation that the new Member States might behave according to their own specific logic, such as significantly decreasing their compliance efforts after accession in order to take ‘revenge’ for the strong pressure of conditionality, is not supported by our case studies. Instead, all four new Member States appear to fall within a group that could be dubbed the ‘world of dead letters’. It is crucial to highlight, however, that this specific ‘world of compliance’, characterized by politicized transposition processes and systematic application and enforcement problems, also includes two countries from the EU‐15.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.
Andrews, A. O., Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393344 · Cited by 8,261
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094 · cited 1×
“2 This approach rests on historical and/or sociological institutionalist reasoning which focuses on the ‘stickiness’ of established policies and administrative routines (see e.g. March and Olsen, 1989; DiMaggio and Powell, 1991; Thelen and Steinmo, 1992; Thelen, 1999; Pierson, 2000).”
BackgroundThe New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001 · Cited by 7,617
Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5387 · Cited by 5,533
HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS
Thelen, K. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 · Cited by 3,409
Historical institutionalism in comparative politics
Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992) · Structuring Politics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528125.002 · Cited by 3,091
Tsebelis, G. (1995) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400007225 · Cited by 2,605
The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge
Light, D. W., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Sociological Analysis · doi:10.2307/3710424 · Cited by 1,612
The Futures of European Capitalism
Schmidt, V. A. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0199253684.001.0001 · Cited by 1,338
Cited by
(2014) · Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- FALKNER, G., & TREIB, O.
- Venue
- JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-14
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-313
- ISSN
- 0021-9886 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5965
- OpenAlex
- W2089262853
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 134.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU‐15 Compared to New Member States*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00777.x
- The paper
- FALKNER, G., & TREIB, O. (2008). Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU‐15 Compared to New Member States*. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00777.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.