The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Policy Learning and Failure
Abstract
Multiple knowledges are available for utilisation in policy choice. The rank ordering of knowledges for use in decisionmaking is thus a fundamental predecision. This article shows how this predecision necessarily constrains the processes associated with a politics of ideas, using cases from American international commodity policy. Even when the supposed preconditions of this sort of politics are present, policy change did not occur when the proposed ideas arose from a knowledge accorded secondary status in policymaking circles. Several implications are discussed for the influence and the study of ideational politics. Ultimately, the politics of ideas, so often portrayed through cases of innovation, may be quite conservative, contained by knowledge hierarchies which reflect prior politicaxl circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Rose, R. (1991) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x00004918 · Cited by 1,356
Cited by
Diffusion Of Innovations Theory, Principles, And Practice
Dearing, J. W., & Cox, J. G. (2018) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1104 · Cited by 757
Making Plans that Matter:Citizen Involvement and Government Action
Burby, R. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944360308976292 · Cited by 631
Policy analytical capacity and evidence‐based policy‐making: Lessons from Canada
Howlett, M. (2009) · Canadian Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x · Cited by 527
Hall, C. M. (2011) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2011.555555 · Cited by 527
Policy transfer in critical perspective
Evans, M. (2009) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442870902863828 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- May, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Policy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 331-354
- ISSN
- 0143-814X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7815
- OpenAlex
- W1966792169
- Cited by
- 860
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Policy Learning and Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0143814x00005602
- The paper
- May, P. J. (1992). Policy Learning and Failure. Journal of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00005602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.