The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Policy analytical capacity and evidence‐based policy‐making: Lessons from Canada
Abstract
Abstract:Evidence‐based policy‐making represents a contemporary effort to reform or re‐structure policy processes in order to prioritize evidentiary or data‐based decision‐making. Like earlier efforts in the “policy analysis movement,” its aim is to avoid or minimize policy failures caused by a mismatch between government expectations and actual, on‐the‐ground conditions through the provision of greater amounts of policy‐relevant information. A significant factor affecting the ability of policy‐makers to engage in evidence‐based policy‐making pertains to both governmental and non‐governmental “policy analytical capacity.” That is, governments require a reasonably high level of policy analytical capacity to perform the tasks associated with managing the policy process in order to implement evidence‐based policy‐making and avoid several of the most common sources of policy failures. Recent studies, however, suggest that, even in advanced countries such as Canada, the level of policy analytical capacity found in many governments and non‐governmental actors is low, potentially contributing to both a failure of evidence‐based policy‐making as well as effectively dealing with many complex contemporary policy challenges. Sommaire:L'élaboration de politiques axée sur des éléments probants représente un effort contemporain de réforme ou de structuration des processus de politiques dans le but de donner la prioritéà la prise de décisions s'appuyant sur les preuves ou fondée sur les données. Comme pour les efforts antérieurs du « mouvement d'analyse de politiques », le but est d'éviter ou de minimiser les échecs de politiques causés par un décalage entre les attentes du gouvernement et les conditions réelles sur le terrain, grâce à la disposition de plus amples informations pertinentes aux politiques. Un facteur important touchant à l'aptitude des élaborateurs de politiques à s'engager dans une élaboration de politiques axée sur les éléments probants est liéà la « capacité d'analyse de politiques » aussi bien gouvernementale que non gouvernementale. C'est‐à‐dire que les gouvernements exigent un niveau raisonnablement élevé de capacité d'analyse de politiques en vue d'exécuter les tâches associées à la gestion du processus politique pour mettre en œuvre l'élaboration de politiques axée sur les éléments probants et éviter ainsi plusieurs sources courantes d'échecs de politiques. Néanmoins, des études récentes laissent entendre que, même dans les pays développés comme le Canada, le niveau de capacité d'analyse de politiques observé dans de nombreux gouvernements et chez un grand nombre d'acteurs non gouvernementaux est faible ; cela pourrait éventuellement contribuer à la fois à un échec de l'élaboration de politiques axées sur les éléments probants ainsi qu'à l'échec de régler efficacement de nombreux problèmes contemporains complexes en matière de politiques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies
Grimes, A. J., & Perrow, C. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257982 · Cited by 4,960
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819054308530 · Cited by 3,190
Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms
McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110792 · Cited by 2,936
Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-5970 · Cited by 2,483
A primer on decision making : how decisions happen
Heath, C., & March, J. G. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,404
The Politics of Blame Avoidance
Weaver, R. K. (1986) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x00004219 · Cited by 2,145
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice
Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (1996) · Cited by 1,920
Pawson, R. (2006) · doi:10.4135/9781849209120 · Cited by 1,791
Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis
Morgan, M. G., & Henrion, M. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840609 · Cited by 1,711
The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change
Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf00138786 · Cited by 1,346
Self-citation
Cited by
Polzin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B., & Schmidt, T. S. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.098 · Cited by 406
Howlett, M. (2014) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0 · Cited by 362
Self-citationThe lessons of failure: learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making
Howlett, M. (2012) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512112453603 · Cited by 331
Self-citationAnticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making
(2020) · OECD Working Papers on Public Governance · doi:10.1787/cce14d80-en · Cited by 303
Big data for policymaking: Fad or fasttrack?
Giest, S. (2017) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9293-1 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Howlett, M.
- Venue
- Canadian Public Administration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-175
- ISSN
- 0008-4840 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-7121
- OpenAlex
- W2068298920
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 21.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Policy analytical capacity and evidence‐based policy‐making: Lessons from Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x
- The paper
- Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence‐based policy‐making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.