Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks: Cumulative Change in Agriculture

Coleman, William D., Skogstad, Grace D., Atkinson, Michael M.·1996·Journal of Public Policy

Abstract

This article presents an alternative trajectory to policy paradigm change to that outlined by Peter A. Hall's social learning model, in which unsuccessful efforts by state officials to respond to policy failures and anomalies in the existing paradigm eventually trigger a broader, societal, political partisan debate about policy principles. From this society-wide contestation over policy goals, problems, and solutions, a new policy paradigm emerges. Drawing on the conceptual tools of policy feedback and policy networks, this article describes an alternative route to paradigm shift in which change is negotiated between state actors and group representatives. Discussions of change are largely confined to sectoral policy networks and the result is a more managed series of policy changes that culminate in a paradigm shift. This argument for a second, cumulative trajectory to paradigm shift is developed by examining agricultural policy change in three countries: the United States, Canada, and Australia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0143814x00007777

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 1995, Budget Plan, 27
  2. 1995, Agenda: Jobs and Growth. Securing our future in agriculture and agri-food
  3. Cochrane, 1976, American Farm Policy, 1948–1973
  4. Williamson, 1989, Corporatism in Perspective
  5. Lehmbruch, 1984, Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism
  6. 10.2307/422246 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Piggott, 1990, Agriculture in the Australian Economy
  8. Browne, 1988, Private Interests, Public Policy and American Agriculture
  9. 10.1017/S0007123400005317 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/CBO9780511805288 · DOI
  11. 1989, Growing Together
  12. 1993, Newsletter to all Wheatgrowers
  13. Brooks, 1994, The Political Economy of US Agriculture
  14. 1992, Working Document
  15. Coleman, 1990, Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A Structural Approach
  16. 10.1080/00323269508402335 · DOI
  17. 1992, Report
  18. 10.1080/01402389308424975 · DOI
  19. Gardner, 1995, Agricultural Policy Reform in the United States
  20. Keeler, 1987, The Politics of Neocorporatism in France
  21. 1993, The Grain File
  22. 10.1353/wp.1996.0004 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.x · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0951692889001002003 · DOI
  25. Schmitter, 1979, Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, 7
  26. Skogstad, 1987, The Politics of Agricultural Policy-Making in Canada, 10.3138/9781487574703 · DOI
  27. Trebeck, 1990, Agriculture in the Australian Economy
  28. 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00287.x · DOI
  29. Weir, 1985, Bringing the State Back In
  30. Young, 1989, Regionalism, Business Interests and Public Policy
  31. Jobert, 1987, L'État en action
  32. 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00560.x · DOI
  33. Skogstad, 1990, Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A Structural Approach
  34. Canadian Dairy Commission (1996). Bulletin, 07.
  35. 10.1007/978-1-349-18041-7_4 · DOI
  36. 1992, Canada and Australia Rely Heavily on Wheat Boards to Market Grain

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coleman, W. D., Skogstad, G. D., & Atkinson, M. M.
Venue
Journal of Public Policy
Published
1996-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
273-301
ISSN
  • 0143-814X
  • 1469-7815
Cited by
167
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review