The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethnographic reflections on selfhood, embodiment and Alzheimer's disease
Open accessAbstract
Explicit in the current construction of Alzheimer's disease is the assumption that memory impairment caused by cognitive deficiencies leads to a steady loss of selfhood. The insistence that selfhood is the exclusive privilege of the sphere of cognition has its origins in the modern western philosophical tradition that separates mind from body, and positions the former as superior to the latter. This dichotomy suggests a fundamental passivity of the body, since it is primarily cognition that is held to be essential to selfhood. In contrast to the assumed erasure of selfhood in Alzheimer's disease, and challenging the philosophical underpinnings of this assumption, this paper presents the findings of an ethnographic study of selfhood in Alzheimer's disease in a Canadian long-term care facility. It argues and demonstrates that selfhood persists even with severe dementia, because it is an embodied dimension of human existence. Using a framework of embodiment that integrates the perspectives of Merleau-Ponty and Bourdieu, it is argued that selfhood is characterised by an observable coherence and capacity for improvisation, and sustained at a pre-reflective level by the primordial and socio-cultural significance of the body. The participants in this study interacted meaningfully with the world through their embodied way of ‘being-in-the-world’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a Theory of Dementia Care: Personhood and Well-being
Kitwood, T., & Bredin, K. (1992) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x0000502x · Cited by 1,129 · cited 1×
“Conceptualising selfhood as essentially ‘ the human being in relation to others ’ (Kitwood and Bredin 1992: 275) is to miss something vital about personhood, namely, how capacities and the senses of the body are central to the very notion of selfhood, and are not derived from social interaction but…”
Background
Cited by
A Critical Lens on Dementia and Design in HCI
Lazar, A., Edasis, C., & Piper, A. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025522 · Cited by 202
The use of everyday technology by people with dementia living alone: Mapping out the difficulties
Nygård, L., & Starkhammar, S. (2007) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860600844168 · Cited by 193
Exploring the Design of Tailored Virtual Reality Experiences for People with Dementia
Hodge, J., Balaam, M., Hastings, S., & Morrissey, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174088 · Cited by 150
Precarity in late life: rethinking dementia as a ‘frailed’ old age
Grenier, A., Lloyd, L., & Phillipson, C. (2017) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12476 · Cited by 110
Hennelly, N., Cooney, A., Houghton, C., & O’Shea, E. (2021) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnz159 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- KONTOS, P. C.
- Venue
- Ageing and Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 829-849
- ISSN
- 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1779
- OpenAlex
- W2127454656
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethnographic reflections on selfhood, embodiment and Alzheimer's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0144686x04002375
- The paper
- KONTOS, P. C. (2004). Ethnographic reflections on selfhood, embodiment and Alzheimer's disease. Ageing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x04002375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.