CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 572Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prevalence of, and risk factors for, loneliness in later life: a survey of older people in Great Britain

Open access
VICTOR, CHRISTINA R., SCAMBLER, SASHA J., BOWLING, ANN, BOND, JOHN·2005·Ageing and Society
DOI 10.1017/s0144686x04003332
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study examines the prevalence of loneliness amongst older people in Great Britain, and makes comparisons with the findings of studies undertaken during the last five decades. In addition, the risk factors for loneliness are examined using a conceptual model of vulnerability and protective factors derived from a model of depression. Loneliness was measured using a self-rating scale, and measures of socio-demographic status and health/social resources were included. Interviews were undertaken with 999 people aged 65 or more years living in their own homes, and the sample was broadly representative of the population in 2001. Among them the prevalence of ‘severe loneliness’ was seven per cent, indicating little change over five decades. Six independent vulnerability factors for loneliness were identified: marital status, increases in loneliness over the previous decade, increases in time alone over the previous decade; elevated mental morbidity; poor current health; and poorer health in old age than expected. Advanced age and possession of post-basic education were independently protective of loneliness. From this evidence we propose that there are three loneliness pathways in later life: continuation of a long-established attribute, late-onset loneliness, and decreasing loneliness. Confirmation of the different trajectories suggests that policies and interventions should reflect the variability of loneliness in later life, for undifferentiated responses may be neither appropriate nor effective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x04003332

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Boersma, N., Feskens, E. J. M., Van den Bos, G. A. M. and Kromhout, D. 1997. Characteristics of non-responders and impact of non-response on prevalence estimates of dementia. International Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 1055-62.
  2. Bowling, A. 1995. The most important things in life. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6, 4, 160-75.
  3. De Jong Gierveld, J. 1998. A review of loneliness : concepts and definitions, causes and consequences. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 8, 73-80.
  4. Jones, D., Victor, C. R. and Vetter, N. J. 1982. The problems of loneliness in the com- munity. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 35, 136-9.
  5. Townsend, P. 1957. The Family Life of Old People. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
  6. Townsend, P. 1968. Isolation and loneliness. In Shanas, E., Townsend, P., Wedderburn, D., Friis, H., Milhoj, P. and Stehouwer, J. (eds), Old People in Three Industrial Societies. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 258-87.
  7. Walker, A. and Hennesey, C. (eds), Quality of Life in Old Age. Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire, 107-26.
  8. Walker, A. and Maltby, T. 1997. Ageing Europe. Open University Press, Buckingham.
  9. Wenger, G. C. 1983. Loneliness: a problem of measurement. In Jerrome, D. (ed.), Ageing in Modern Society. Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent, 145-67.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 572

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
VICTOR, C. R., SCAMBLER, S. J., BOWLING, A., & BOND, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • University of Roehampton (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Ageing and Society
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2005-04-22
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
357-375
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
DOI
10.1017/s0144686x04003332
OpenAlex
W2123271605
Cited by
572
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 22
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
  • Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
loneliness, older adults, prevalence, risk factors, marital status, time alone, psychiatric morbidity, elderly health, educational attainment, loneliness trajectories, social isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review