The association between activity and wellbeing in later life: what really matters?
Abstract
This paper reports a study of the complex associations between older people's participation in activities and their wellbeing in later life using data from a national sample of 1,334 Jewish-Israeli retirees. Confirmatory factor analysis substantiated a division of the activities into solitary, formal and informal categories, as postulated by activity theory. The outcome measure, the latent construct wellbeing, was compiled from scores on the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), a global measure of life satisfaction, and a measure of satisfaction with the use of time. The analysis also examined the influence of socio-economic status, health status and the quality of inter-personal relationships. ‘Social relationship quality’, also a latent construct, was a composite of measures of satisfaction with children, friends and neighbours and a self-rated loneliness scale. Path analysis using structural equation modelling was employed. The results showed that when the quality of social relationships was taken into account, the amount of activity had no independent effect on the respondents' wellbeing. Moreover, it was social relationship quality, a facet of informal activity that has generally been neglected in activity research, that emerged as the most influential variable in the association between activity and wellbeing. Thus, the findings provide empirical backing for the assertion that the quality of social ties matters more than activity participation per se as predictors of a good old age.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In several reviewed studies, informal social activity or social intimacy was shown to be the variable with the greatest independent effect upon wellbeing outcomes.
“In several of the studies, informal social activity or social intimacy was shown to be the variable with the greatest independent effect upon wellbeing outcomes (cf.Everard 1999;Litwin and Shiovitz-Ezra 2006 ;Maier and Klumb 2005;Ritchey, Ritchey and Dietz 2001;Warr, Butcher and Robertson 2004).”
From A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life (2011) · cites this paper as Litwin and Shiovitz-Ezra 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life
ADAMS, K. B., LEIBBRANDT, S., & MOON, H. (2011) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x10001091 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Liu, H., Xie, Q. W., & Lou, V. W. Q. (2019) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-018-9735-x · Cited by 104 · see citing works
- Authors
- LITWIN, H., & SHIOVITZ-EZRA, S.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- ORCID
- LITWIN, HOWARD
- Venue
- Ageing and Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-02-27
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-242
- ISSN
- 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1779
- OpenAlex
- W2166484949
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Keywords
- activity theory, older adults, well-being, interpersonal relationships, informal practices, solitary activities, life satisfaction, loneliness, socioeconomic status, health status
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review