The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ‘elected’ and the ‘excluded’: sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age
Abstract
This article explores various issues concerned with belonging and identity in the context of community change and residential location. It examines the changing nature of community attachments in later life, and their impacts on the quality of old age lives. It also notes the increased importance of environmental perspectives within gerontology, not least because environments are being transformed through the diverse social, cultural and economic changes associated with globalisation. The argument is developed that globalisation offers a new approach to thinking about community and environmental relationships in later life, and that the impact of global change at a local level has become an important dimension of sociological aspects of community change. It is argued that it is especially important to apply these perspectives to older people, given that many have resided in the same locality for long periods. At the same time, globalisation also gives rise to new types of movement in old age, and is constructing an expanding mix of spaces, communities and lifestyle settings. A key argument of the article, however, is that global processes are generating new social divisions, as between those able to choose residential locations consistent with their biographies and life histories, and those who experience rejection or marginalisation from their locality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Savage, M., Bagnall, G., & Longhurst, B. (2005) · doi:10.4135/9781446216880 · Cited by 993
Cited by
What makes a community age‐friendly: A review of international literature
Lui, C., Everingham, J., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009) · Australasian Journal on Ageing · doi:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x · Cited by 441
Community Gerontology: A Framework for Research, Policy, and Practice on Communities and Aging
Greenfield, E. A., Black, K., Buffel, T., & Yeh, J. (2019) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gny089 · Cited by 88
Social exclusion and community in an urban retirement village
Nielson, L., Wiles, J., & Anderson, A. (2019) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2019.03.003 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- PHILLIPSON, C.
- Venue
- Ageing and Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-27
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 321-342
- ISSN
- 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1779
- OpenAlex
- W2132887076
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ‘elected’ and the ‘excluded’: sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0144686x06005629
- The paper
- PHILLIPSON, C. (2007). The ‘elected’ and the ‘excluded’: sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. Ageing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x06005629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.