Cited by 38Survey Methodology and NonresponseResearch Data Management PracticesData Analysis and Archiving

The harmonisation of longitudinal data: a case study using data from cohort studies in The Netherlands and the United Kingdom

BATH, PETER A., DEEG, DORLY, POPPELAARS, JAN·2010·Ageing and Society

Abstract

This paper presents a case study of the challenges and requirements associated with harmonising data from two independently-conceived datasets from The Netherlands and the United Kingdom: the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) and the Nottingham Longitudinal Study of Activity and Ageing (NLSAA). The objectives were to create equivalent samples and variables, and to identify the methodological differences that affect the comparability of the samples. Data are available from the two studies' 1992–93 surveys for respondents born during 1908–20, and the common data set had 1,768 records and enabled the creation of 26 harmonised variables in the following domains: demographic composition and personal finances, physical health, mental health and loneliness, contacts with health services, physical activity, religious attendance and pet ownership. The ways in which the methodological differences between the two studies and their different selective attrition might lead to sample differences were carefully considered. It was concluded that the challenges of conducting cross-national comparative research using independent datasets include differences in sampling, study design, measurement instruments, response rates and selective attrition. To reach conclusions from any comparative study about substantive socio-cultural differences, these challenges must first be identified and addressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x1000070x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A range of psychosocial interventions involving diverse study designs have been developed to reduce loneliness and social isolation in vulnerable older adults.

    “To date, a range of psychosocial interventions involving diverse study designs have been developed to reduce loneliness and social isolation in vulnerable older adults [33].”
  • Follow-up analysis including potential moderators (gender, age, type of loneliness measure) revealed that only gender had a moderating influence on the effect size; studies with more women in the sample showed a smaller reduction in loneliness.

    “Furthermore, follow-up analysis that included potential moderators (gender, age, type of loneliness measure) revealed that only gender had a moderating influence on the effect size. Studies with more women in the sample showed a smaller reduction in loneliness.”
  • Compared to other interventions, those addressing deficits in social cognition had the largest mean effect (−0.598, 96% CI = −0.96, −0.23).

    “Compared to other interventions, those addressing deficits in social cognition had the largest mean effect (−0.598, 96% CI = −0.96, −0.23).”
  • Meta-analysis of randomized loneliness-reducing intervention studies revealed a small effect size of −0.198 (96% CI = −0.32, −0.08).

    “Meta-analysis of the randomized studies revealed a small effect size (−0.198, 96% CI = −0.32, −0.08).”
  • These interventions have attempted to improve social skills, enhance social support, increase opportunities for social interaction, and address maladaptive social cognition.

    “With variable success, these interventions have attempted to improve social skills (e.g., through social recreation), enhance social support (e.g., via mentoring, home visits), increase opportunities for social interaction (e.g., telephone outreach, nonverbal communication), and address maladaptive social cognition (e.g., psychological reframing or cognitive behavioral therapy).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BATH, P. A., DEEG, D., & POPPELAARS, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
BATH, PETER A.
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2010-09-29
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
1419-1437
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2115971468
Cited by
38
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
Keywords
data harmonization, cross-national comparison, cohort studies, Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, selective attrition, sample comparability, measurement invariance, aging, older adults, health and well-being, physical activity, loneliness, religious service attendance, pet ownership, sociocultural differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review