Cited by 45Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentHuman Resource Development and Performance EvaluationGenerational Differences and Trends

In the name of meritocracy: managers' perceptions of policies and practices for training older workers

Open access
MARTIN, GREGORY, DYMOCK, DARRYL, BILLETT, STEPHEN, JOHNSON, GREER·2014·Ageing and Society

Abstract

Workplaces, managers and employers who are seeking to maintain the standing, capacities and productivity of their workplaces are now facing two crucial facts: (a) an ageing workforce and (b) all workers, regardless of age, need to adapt to the changing requirements for workplace performance. These facts mean that managers and supervisors need to confront issues found in the changing demographics of their own workforce. That is, as the portion of workforces aged over 45 years (i.e.older workers) increases, it is these workers who are available to be employed, and supported in sustaining their ongoing employability. To address these issues requires understanding of particular workers' capacities and aspirations and then acting to develop further their capacities based on new understanding, and rebutting social sentiments about these workers that are often value-laden, contradictory and biased. The case here is made through drawing on literature and analyses of interview data of Australian managers of older workers, that the current logic of management relies upon deeply held and widely shared beliefs of age-blind meritocracy and equal opportunity rather than informed views.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x12001432

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organizations adopting age-friendly employment practices are likely to attract older people and gain a wider talent pool.

    “Organizations that adopt age-friendly employment practices are likely to attract an older population and find themselves able to choose from a wider pool of talent (Martin et al., 2014).”

    From Policy Initiatives to Address the Challenges of an Older Population in the Workforce (2023) · cites this paper as Martin et al., 2014

    The 'Employer attitudes to older workers' section describes HR policies intended to protect and attract older workers, supporting the attraction part of the claim. It does not say that adopting those practices is likely to give organizations a wider talent pool, and cautions that policies alone are no cure-all without a commitment to challenging discrimination. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 45

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Barnes, S., Bimrose, J. and Brown, A. . Older workers' careers: upskilling, reskilling and transitions. Paper presented to the European Conference on Educational Research, - September, Geneva.
  2. Guy, M. and Newman, M. . Valuing diversity in the changing workplace. In Condrey, S. (ed.), Handbook of Human Resource Management in Government. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, -.
  3. Harris, L., Foster, C. and Sempik, A. . Employers' policies for third age employment -the case for action and the rationale for reaction. Research paper presented at the CIPD Conference, - June, Keele University, UK. Available online at http://www.cipd.co.uk/NR/.../HarrisFosterandSempikresearchpaperD. pdf [Accessed  March ].
  4. Kendig, H. and Phillips, R. . Health, economic, and policy implications of an ageing Australia. In Phillips, R. (ed.), Generational Change and Social Policy Challenges: Australia and South Korea. University of Sydney Press, Sydney, -.
  5. McNair, S., Maltby, T. with Nettleship, S. . Age, Training and Employment: A Review of the Literature. Centre for Research into the Older Workforce, NIACE, Leicester, UK.
  6. Mills, S. . Discourse. Routledge, London.
  7. Patrickson, M. and Ranzijn, R. . Workforce ageing: the challenges for st century management. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, , , -.
  8. Pillay, H., Kelly, K. and Tones, M. . Supporting the mature age workforce. New Zealand Journal of Human Resource Management, , , -.
  9. Ranzijn, R., Carson, E. and Winefield, A. . Barriers to mature age re- employment: perceptions about desirable work-related attributes held by job seekers and employers. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, , , -.
  10. Taylor, B. and Bengston, V. . Sociological perspectives on productive ageing. In Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J. and Sherraden, M. (eds), Productive Ageing: Concepts and Challenges. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, -.
  11. Tripp, D. . Critical Incidents in Teaching: The Development of Professional Judgement. Routledge, London.

Authors
MARTIN, G., DYMOCK, D., BILLETT, S., & JOHNSON, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
MARTIN, GREGORY
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2013-01-11
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
992-1018
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2160637406
Cited by
45
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Griffith University
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
Keywords
older workers, aging workforce, equal opportunities, managers' perceptions, employee training, employability, ageism, workplace aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review