Cited by 19Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesAging, Health, and Disability

Biology as destiny? Rethinking embodiment in ‘deep’ old age

Open access
PICKARD, SUSAN·2014·Ageing and Society

Abstract

Despite sociological understanding that bodies are social and morphological, material and discursive, there is a persistent, prevailing tendency within sociology to approach the old body – particularly in ‘deep old age’ – as non-social. No longer amenable either to reflexive (consumerist) choice, or expressive of the self, it is viewed rather through a biomedical explanatory framework in which it is held to succumb to ‘natural’ physiological processes of decline that lie outside culture. This paper critically questions such assumptions which it links to sociology's acquiescing in modernity's age ideology rather than taking it as a starting point for critique. This means that sociology's sensitivity towards ageing is displayed not in challenging models of the older body but in diverting attention away from the body altogether and focusing on structural and cultural determinants which are not considered to encompass physiology. Arguing, however, that biology and society do not exist on separate plains, and that the body in deep old age is, like other bodies, first and foremost a social body, the paper draws upon feminist methodology and epistemology for the purpose of dismantling such essentialism. It suggests that the sociological imagination will benefit from the eradication of age ideology through a clearer understanding not just of ageing but of embodiment at all stages of the lifecourse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x13000196

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The discipline's treatment of age may stem from a naturalistic view of age (and aging) as biological and, therefore, presocial or even nonsocial.

    “The discipline's treatment of age also may stem from a naturalistic view of age (and aging) as biological and, therefore, presocial or even nonsocial (e.g., Calasanti 2010, Pickard 2014, Twigg 2013).”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Pickard 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PICKARD, S.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
PICKARD, SUSAN
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2013-04-11
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1279-1291
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2106449763
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
embodiment, aging, social body, biology and society, essentialism, feminist epistemology, feminist methodology, physiological decline, sociology of aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review