Biology as destiny? Rethinking embodiment in ‘deep’ old age
Open accessAbstract
Despite sociological understanding that bodies are social and morphological, material and discursive, there is a persistent, prevailing tendency within sociology to approach the old body – particularly in ‘deep old age’ – as non-social. No longer amenable either to reflexive (consumerist) choice, or expressive of the self, it is viewed rather through a biomedical explanatory framework in which it is held to succumb to ‘natural’ physiological processes of decline that lie outside culture. This paper critically questions such assumptions which it links to sociology's acquiescing in modernity's age ideology rather than taking it as a starting point for critique. This means that sociology's sensitivity towards ageing is displayed not in challenging models of the older body but in diverting attention away from the body altogether and focusing on structural and cultural determinants which are not considered to encompass physiology. Arguing, however, that biology and society do not exist on separate plains, and that the body in deep old age is, like other bodies, first and foremost a social body, the paper draws upon feminist methodology and epistemology for the purpose of dismantling such essentialism. It suggests that the sociological imagination will benefit from the eradication of age ideology through a clearer understanding not just of ageing but of embodiment at all stages of the lifecourse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The discipline's treatment of age may stem from a naturalistic view of age (and aging) as biological and, therefore, presocial or even nonsocial.
“The discipline's treatment of age also may stem from a naturalistic view of age (and aging) as biological and, therefore, presocial or even nonsocial (e.g., Calasanti 2010, Pickard 2014, Twigg 2013).”
From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Pickard 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework
Barrett, A. E. (2022) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-083121-043741 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- PICKARD, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- PICKARD, SUSAN
- ORCID
- PICKARD, SUSAN
- Venue
- Ageing and Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-04-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1279-1291
- ISSN
- 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1779
- OpenAlex
- W2106449763
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Keywords
- embodiment, aging, social body, biology and society, essentialism, feminist epistemology, feminist methodology, physiological decline, sociology of aging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review