Cited by 44Aging and Gerontology ResearchGender and Feminist StudiesAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

‘It's our turn to play’: performance of girlhood as a collective response to gendered ageism

BARRETT, ANNE E., NAIMAN-SESSIONS, MIRIAM·2016·Ageing and Society

Abstract

ABSTRACT In our society that values men over women and youth over old age, sexism and ageism intersect to erode women's status more rapidly and severely than men's. However, limited attention is given to women's responses to their devaluation, particularly collective efforts to either resist or accommodate dominant beliefs about ageing women. We examine membership in the Red Hat Society, an international organisation for middle-aged and older women, as a response to gendered ageism. Drawing on data from semi-structured interviews with members (N = 52), our analysis focuses on the group's ‘performance of girlhood’, which involves adopting children's social roles, dressing up and playing. We examine its resonance with a dominant cultural metaphor for old age as ‘second childhood’, illustrating how it not only provides opportunities for resistance to gendered ageism but also contributes to its entrenchment. The behaviours constitute a performative act that resists gendered ageism by increasing ageing women's visibility and asserting their right to leisure. However, its accommodative features reproduce inequality by valuing youth over old age and depicting older women as girls engaging in frivolous activities, which can be seen as obstructing social change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x15000021

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performances aimed at masking one's age are responses to the culture's devaluation of older adults.

    “As sociologists have noted, such performances are responses to the culture's devaluation of older adults”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Barrett & Naiman-Sessions 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BARRETT, A. E., & NAIMAN-SESSIONS, M.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
BARRETT, ANNE E.
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2015-02-09
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
764-784
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2131065896
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
gendered ageism, older women, middle-aged women, women's leisure, women's organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review