Cited by 74LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesGender and Feminist Studies

‘We treat them all the same’: the attitudes, knowledge and practices of staff concerning old/er lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans residents in care homes

Open access
SIMPSON, PAUL, ALMACK, KATHRYN, WALTHERY, PIERRE·2018·Ageing and Society

Abstract

The distinct needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) residents in care homes accommodating older people have been neglected in scholarship. On the basis of a survey of 187 individuals, including service managers and direct care staff, we propose three related arguments. First, whilst employees’ attitudes generally indicate a positive disposition towards LGBT residents, this appears unmatched by the ability to recognise such individuals and knowledge of the issues and policies affecting LGBT people. Statements such as, ‘We don't have any [LGBT residents] at the moment’ and ‘I/we treat them all the same’ were common refrains in responses to open-ended questions. They suggest the working of heteronormativity which could deny sexual and identity difference. Second, failure to recognise the distinct health and social care needs of LGBT residents means that they could be subject to a uniform service, which presumes a heterosexual past and cisgender status (compliance with ascribed gender), which risks compounding inequality and invisibility. Third, LGBT residents could be obliged to depend largely on the goodwill, knowledge and reflexivity of individual staff (including people of faith) to meet care and personal needs, though such qualities were necessary but not sufficient conditions for inclusion and no substitute for collective practices (involving commitment to learn about LGBT issues) that become integral to care homes’ everyday functioning. A collective approach is key to advancing inclusion, implementation of legal rights to self-expression and securing equality through differentiated provision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x1600132x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exclusionary attitudes towards gender and sexual minorities among LV choirs may stem from entrenched social codes, which may relate to older men's reluctance to disclose their gender or sexual identity because of historic stigmatisation and the perceived benefits of male-focused spaces.

    “It is possible that exclusionary attitudes towards gender and sexual minorities may stem from these entrenched codes within LV choirs, that may in turn relate to the reluctance among older men to disclose their gender or sexual identity because of historic stigmatisation (Simpson et al. 2018), and the perceived benefits of male-focussed spaces (Milligan et al. 2016;Mackenzie et al. 2017;Nurmi et a”

    From ‘I don’t care who joins my choir’: Investigating attitudes to diversity and inclusivity in lower- and upper-voice choirs in the United Kingdom (2025) · cites this paper as Simpson et al. 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Apparently inclusive sentiments among choir members and directors likely indicate the regulatory force of heteronormativity and cisgenderism, especially when they are not converted into strategically-informed practices such as inclusion policies.

    “However, these apparently inclusive sentiments seem likely to 'indicate the regulatory force of heteronormativity [...] and cisgenderism' (Simpson et al. 2018: 871), especially when they fail to be converted into strategically-informed practices such as the development of inclusion policies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Addis, S., Davies, M., Greene, G., MacBride-Stewart, S. and Shepherd, M. . The health, social care and housing needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender older people: a review of the literature. Health and Social Care in the Community, , , -.
  2. Almack, K., Moss, B. and Smith, T. . Research and policy about end-of-life care for LGBT people: identifying the implications for social work services. In Fish, J. and Karban, K. (eds), Social Work and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans Health Inequalities: International Perspectives. Polity Press, Cambridge, -.
  3. Anderson, E. . Inclusive Masculinity: The Changing Nature of Masculinities. Routledge, London.
  4. Bryman, A. . Quantity and Quality in Social Research. Routledge, London.
  5. Bryman, A. . Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  6. Cicourel, A. . Method and Measurement in Sociology. Free Press, New York.
  7. Concannon, L. . Developing inclusive health and social care policies for older lgb&t citizens. British Journal of Social Work, , , -.
  8. Dorsen, C. . An integrative review of nurse attitudes towards lesbian, gay, bisex- ual, and transgender patients. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, , , -.
  9. Edmunds, J. and Turner, B. . Generations, Culture and Society. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.
  10. Fredriksen-Goldsen, K., Hoy-Ellis, C., Goldsen, J., Emlet, C. and Hooyman, N. . Creating a vision for the future: key competencies and strategies for culturally competent practice with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) older adults in the health and human services. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, , -, -.
  11. Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. and Muraco, A. . Aging and sexual orientation: a - year review of the literature. Research on Aging, , , -.
  12. Giddens, A. . The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Polity, Cambridge.
  13. Hafford-Letchfield, T. . 'What's love got to do with it?' Developing supportive practices for the expression of sexuality, sexual identity and the intimacy needs of older people. Journal of Care Services Management, , , -.
  14. Heaphy, B. . Sexualities, gender and ageing: resources and social change. Current Sociology, , , -. Help the Aged . My Home Life. The Quality of Life in Care Homes: A Review of the Literature. Help the Aged, London.
  15. Holloway, M. and Taplin, S. . Editorial -death in social work: twenty-first century challenges. British Journal of Social Work, , , -.
  16. Hughes, A., Harold, R. and Boyer, J. . Awareness of lgbt ageing issues among ageing service network providers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, , , -.
  17. Johnson, M., Bengtson, V. and Coleman, P. . The Cambridge Handbook on Age and Ageing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  18. Johnson, M., Jackson, N., Arnette, K. and Koffman, S. . Gay and lesbian perceptions of discrimination in retirement care facilities. Journal of Homosexuality, , , -.
  19. Knochel, K., Quam, J. and Croghan, C. . Are old lesbian and gay people well served? Understanding the perceptions, preparation and experiences of ageing service providers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, , , -.
  20. McGhee, D. . The End of Multiculturalism? Terrorism, Integration & Human Rights. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.
  21. Moran, L., Skeggs, B., Tyrer, P. and Korteen, K. . Sexuality and the Politics of Violence and Safety. Routledge, London.
  22. Neville, S., Adams, J., Bellamy, G., Boyd, M. and George, N. . Perceptions towards lesbian, gay and bisexual people in residential care facilities. International Journal of Older People Nursing, , , -.
  23. Office for National Statistics (ONS) . Statistical Bulletin: Old People's Day . ONS, London.
  24. Office for National Statistics (ONS) . Press Release: Characteristics of Older People - What Does the  Census Tell Us About the Oldest Old Living in England and Wales? ONS, London.
  25. Patton, M. . Qualitative Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  26. Phillips, J. and Marks, G. . Ageing lesbians: marginalizing discourses and social exclusion in the aged care industry. Journal of Lesbian and Gay Social Services, , /, -.
  27. Rattray, J. and Jones, M. C. . Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, , , -.
  28. Rose, G. . Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  29. Simpson, P. . Middle-aged Gay Men, Ageing and Ageism: Over the Rainbow? Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
  30. Stein, G. L., Beckerman, N. L. and Sherman, P. A. . Lesbian and gay elders and long-term care: identifying the unique psychosocial perspectives and challenges. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, , , -.
  31. Sullivan, K. . Acceptance in the domestic environment: the experience of senior housing for LGBT seniors. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, , -, -.
  32. Tolley, C. and Ranzijn, R. . Predictors of heteronormativity in residential aged care facilities. Australasian Journal on Ageing, , , -.
  33. Weeks, J. . The World We Have Won: The Remaking of Erotic and Intimate Life. Routledge, London.
  34. Westwood, S. . 'I may be older but I ain't no elder': a critique of 'elder law'. Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review, , , -.
  35. Witten, T. and Whittle, S. . TransPanthers: the greying of transgender and the law. Deakin Law Review, , , -.

Authors
SIMPSON, P., ALMACK, K., & WALTHERY, P.
Affiliations
University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
SIMPSON, PAUL
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2016-12-29
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
869-899
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2566602775
Cited by
74
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
care homes, employee attitudes, heteronormativity, inclusion, gender identity, sexual identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review