Cited by 265Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesRetirement, Disability, and Employment

The seductiveness of agelessness

ANDREWS, MOLLY·1999·Ageing and Society

Abstract

In recent years, many researchers in the study of ageing have adopted a terminology of ‘agelessness’. They argue that old age is nothing more than a social construct and that until it is eliminated as a conceptual category, ageism will continue to flourish. This article challenges this view, stating that the current tendency towards ‘agelessness’ is itself a form of ageism, depriving the old of one of their most hard-earned resources: their age. Specific theories of ageing (successful ageing, mask of ageing, continuity theory) are assessed in this light, and original data are presented as evidence of old age as a unique phase of the lifecycle replete with continued developmental possibilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x99007369

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age inequality is featured in critical gerontology, an area that developed in the 1980s in reaction to positivism's dominance and its increasing tilt toward a biomedical view of aging.

    “Age inequality also is featured in critical gerontology, an area that developed in the 1980s in reaction both to positivism's dominance in the field and to its increasing tilt toward a biomedical view of aging (e.g., Andrews 1999, Cole et al. 1993, Estes 1979, Laws 1995, Phillipson 1998, Wellin 2018).”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Andrews 1999

  • Color blindness and agelessness both center on the idea that inequality can be eradicated by refusing to acknowledge the existence of social categories, and both are undermined by their denials of inequality and individuals' experiences of it.

    “Both approaches center on the seductively simple idea that inequality can be eradicated by refusing to acknowledge the existence of social categories, but both are undermined by their denials of inequality and individuals' experiences of it.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Andrews 1999

  • Scholarship emphasizes the ageism underlying the cultural celebration of youthful identities.

    “as well as scholarship emphasizing the ageism underlying the cultural celebration of youthful identities (e.g., Andrews 1999, Biggs 1997, Gullette 2004).”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Andrews 1999

  • Critical gerontology draws links between age identity and age inequality more clearly than other approaches.

    “Age identity's links to age inequality are drawn more clearly in critical gerontology.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Andrews 1999

  • The current tendency towards 'agelessness' is itself a form of ageism, depriving older people of their age as a hard-earned resource.

    “the current tendency towards 'agelessness' is itself a form of ageism, depriving the old of one of their most hard-earned resources: their age.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Andrews 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ANDREWS, M.
Affiliations
University of East London (GB)
Corresponding author
ANDREWS, MOLLY
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
1999-05
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
301-318
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W1988283884
Cited by
265
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
agelessness, ageism, old age, successful aging, continuity theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review