The DOI matches its Crossref record.
International peacebuilding and the ‘mission civilisatrice’
Abstract
International peacebuilding operations seek to stabilise countries that have recently experienced civil wars. In pursuing this goal, however, international peacebuilders have promulgated a particular vision of how states should organise themselves internally, based on the principles of liberal democracy and market-oriented economics. By reconstructing war-shattered states in accordance with this vision, peacebuilders have effectively ‘transmitted’ standards of appropriate behaviour from the Western-liberal core of the international system to the failed states of the periphery. From this perspective, peacebuilding resembles an updated (and more benign) version of the mission civilisatrice, or the colonial-era belief that the European imperial powers had a duty to ‘civilise’ dependent populations and territories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
At war's end: building peace after civil conflict
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-3683 · Cited by 913
(2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491207 · Cited by 461
Neotrusteeship and the problem of weak states
Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2004) · International Security · doi:10.1162/0162288041588296 · Cited by 437
Postconflict Reconstruction in Africa: Flawed Ideas about Failed States
Englebert, P., & Tull, D. M. (2008) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec.2008.32.4.106 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Paris, R.
- Venue
- Review of International Studies
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 637-656
- ISSN
- 0260-2105 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9044
- OpenAlex
- W2006938389
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 98.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International peacebuilding and the ‘mission civilisatrice’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s026021050200637x
- The paper
- Paris, R. (2002). International peacebuilding and the ‘mission civilisatrice’. Review of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026021050200637x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.