The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
At war's end: building peace after civil conflict
Abstract
All fourteen major peacebuilding missions launched between 1989 and 1999 shared a common strategy for consolidating peace after internal conflicts: immediate democratization and marketization. Transforming war-shattered states into market democracies is basically sound, but pushing this process too quickly can have damaging and destabilizing effects. The process of liberalization is inherently tumultuous, and can undermine the prospects for stable peace. A more sensible approach to post-conflict peacebuilding would seek, first, to establish a system of domestic institutions that are capable of managing the destabilizing effects of democratization and marketization within peaceful bounds and only then phase in political and economic reforms slowly, as conditions warrant. Peacebuilders should establish the foundations of effective governmental institutions prior to launching wholesale liberalization programs. Avoiding the problems that marred many peacebuilding operations in the 1990s will require longer-lasting and, ultimately, more intrusive forms of intervention in the domestic affairs of these states. This book was first published in 2004.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
FEARON, J. D., & LAITIN, D. D. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000534 · Cited by 7,366
Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy: (504012013-001)
Collier, P., Elliot, V. L., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal-Querol, M., & Sambanis, N. (2003) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e504012013-001 · Cited by 2,431
The security dilemma and ethnic conflict
Posen, B. R. (1993) · Survival · doi:10.1080/00396339308442672 · Cited by 1,420
Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic
Berman, S. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0008 · Cited by 1,108
A Democratic South Africa?: Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society
Horowitz, D. L. (1991) · doi:10.1525/9780520328884 · Cited by 689
Cited by
World development report 2011: conflict, security, and development
Baranyi, S., Beaudet, P., & Locher, U. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement · doi:10.1080/02255189.2011.622569 · Cited by 965
From Transitional to Transformative Justice: A New Agenda for Practice
Gready, P., & Robins, S. (2014) · International Journal of Transitional Justice · doi:10.1093/ijtj/iju013 · Cited by 507
Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., & Söderbom, M. (2008) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343308091356 · Cited by 505
Dynamics and Logics of Civil War
Cederman, L.-E., & Vogt, M. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717721385 · Cited by 214
Evolution Without Progress? Humanitarianism in a World of Hurt
Barnett, M. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309990087 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 42-3683-42-3683
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1577489325
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 6
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: At war's end: building peace after civil conflict. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.42-3683
- The paper
- At war's end: building peace after civil conflict. (2005). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-3683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.