CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 54Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLexicography and Language Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 94 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vocabulary and second/foreign language teaching

Carter, Ronald·1987·Language Teaching
DOI 10.1017/s0261444800004225
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0261444800004225

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Wilkins, 1976, Notional syllabuses
  2. Wallace, 1982, Teaching vocabulary
  3. Stein, 1979, Nuclear English: reflections on the structure of its vocabulary, Poetics, 10, 27
  4. Rudska, 1985, More words you need
  5. Francis, 1986, Anaphoric nouns. Discourse Analysis Monographs
  6. Stubbs, 1983, Discourse analysis
  7. Cowie, 1981, Special issue on pedagogical lexicography, Applied Linguistics, 2, 3
  8. West, 1953, A general service list of English words
  9. Hartmann, 1979, Dictionaries and their users. Papers from the 1978 BAAL seminar on lexicography, Exeter Linguistic Studies, I, 4
  10. Cutler, 1982, One mental lexicon, phonologically arranged, Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 107
  11. Cowie A. P. (1983 a). On specifying grammar. In Hartmann R. R. K. (ed.), 99–108.
  12. Nation, 1980, Strategies for receptive vocabulary learning, Guidelines: RELC Supplement, 3, 171
  13. Channell J. (forthcoming). Psychological approaches to L2 vocabulary acquisition. In Carter R. A. & McCarthy M. (eds.).
  14. Ruhl, 1979, The Fifth LACUS Forum
  15. Cowie, 1975, Oxford dictionary of current idiomatic English
  16. Morrow, 1980, Skills for reading
  17. Porter, 1983, The words you need. Reading in a Foreign Language, I, 68
  18. Meara, 1980, Vocabulary acquisition: a neglected aspect of language learning (survey article), Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts, 4, 13
  19. Benson, 1985, Dictionaries, lexicography and language learning, 61
  20. Alexander, 1984, English Language Research
  21. Lord, 1974, Learning vocabulary, IRAL, 12, 239
  22. Carter, 1982, A note on core vocabulary, Nottingham Linguistic Circular, II, 39
  23. Carter, 1983, You look nice and weedy these days!’: lexical associations, lexicography and the foreign language learner, Journal of Applied Language Study, I, 172
  24. West, 1935, Definition vocabulary
  25. Carter R. A. (forthcoming a). Vocabulary, cloze and discourse. In Carter R. A. & McCarthy M. (eds.).
  26. Hasan, 1984, Understanding reading comprehension, 181
  27. Channell J. (1983). Vague language use: some vague expressions in English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of York.
  28. Alderson, 1978, The development of strategies for the assignment of semantic information to unknown lexemes in text, Mextesol Journal, 2, 4
  29. Long, 1980, Readthru
  30. Ghadessy, 1979, Frequency counts, word lists and materials preparation: a new approach, Forum, 17, 24
  31. Brown, 1979, Vocabulary: learning to be imprecise, Modern English Teacher, 7, 25
  32. Hoey, 1983, On the surface of discourse
  33. Jain, 1979, Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 86
  34. McCarthy, 1985, ProJlciencyplus:grammar, lexis, discourse
  35. Cowie A. P. (1983 b). English dictionaries for the foreign learner. In Hartman R. R. K. (ed.), 135–43.
  36. McArthur, 1978, The vocabulary control movement in the English language, Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 47
  37. Meara, 1984, Interlanguage, 225
  38. Lyons, 1977, Semantics
  39. McCarthy, 1984, English Language Research
  40. Makkai, 1980, Theory and method in lexicography
  41. Itson, 1985, Dictionaries, lexicography and language learning
  42. Meara, 1982, Word associations in a foreign language: report on the Birkbeck vocabulary project, Nottingham Linguistic Circular, II, 29
  43. Ogden, 1930, Basic English: a general introduction

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Carter, R.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Carter, Ronald
ORCID
Carter, Ronald
Venue
Language Teaching
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1987-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
3-16
ISSN
  • 0261-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3049
DOI
10.1017/s0261444800004225
OpenAlex
W2115981557
Cited by
50
References
101
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 8027 d)
Locations
Language Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Lexicography and Language Studies
Keywords
vocabulary teaching, second language teaching, foreign language teaching, vocabulary acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review