The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care
Abstract
Summary: During its first year of operation (1988) the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care focused on nine areas. Additional activities will be added as need requires and resources permit. Also, preparations for 1989 projects have begun. The nine areas include: identification of technologies needing assessment, including international comparisons; review and synthesis of the value of preoperative routines; review and synthesis of the value of gastroscopy for diagnosing stomach pain; assessment of different treatment methods for back pain; assessment of the value of vascular surgery for vascular spasms in the legs; organization of a strategy conference concerning medical technology assessment in Sweden; creation of a strategy that addresses an international review of medical technology, future technologies in health care, waiting lists for medical care - the importance of medical technology, resource utilization and organizational and educational aspects of introducing new technology in health care, and costs and medical technology; translation of foreign assessment studies, with comments; national and international cooperation. SCTA has discussed the need for assessing specific technology such as bone marrow transplantation and surgical treatment of epilepsy. SCTA's Scientific Advisory Committee has additionally considered the following subjects for future projects: medical, social, and economic consequences of alternative technologies screening for prostate, colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer; costs, indications, and medical benefit of surgery for varicose yams; and modern urology technologies, particularly those related to prostate care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Marshall, D., Johnell, O., & Wedel, H. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254 · Cited by 3,709
Adverse pregnancy outcomes in snuff users
England, L. J., Levine, R. J., Mills, J. L., Klebanoff, M. A., Yu, K. F., & Cnattingius, S. (2003) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00661-6 · Cited by 174
Stabilizing training compared with manual treatment in sub-acute and chronic low-back pain
Rasmussen-Barr, E., Nilsson-Wikmar, L., & Arvidsson, I. (2003) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00053-5 · Cited by 165
Kinesiophobia in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: differences between men and women
Bränström, H., & Fahlström, M. (2008) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-0186 · Cited by 164
Brorsson, B., Bernstein, S. J., Brook, R. H., & Werkö, L. (2002) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heart.87.2.140 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 154-158
- ISSN
- 0266-4623 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6348
- OpenAlex
- W2398509045
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0266462300006061
- The paper
- The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. (1989). International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300006061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.