Retrieval of missing data for meta-analysis: A practical example
Open accessAbstract
Objectives:To examine the feasibility of retrieving missing outcome data for summary meta-analyses using an example dealing with the effects of aerobic exercise on lipids and lipoproteins in adults. Methods:Missing lipid and/or lipoprotein data from a currently developed meta-analytic data base were requested by means of electronic mail from 39 of 174 (22.4 percent) eligible studies. Binary logistic regression was used to examine whether year of publication and country were significant predictors for whether data would be provided. Results:Of the thirty-nine studies from which data were requested, usable data were received for thirteen (33.3 percent) of the studies. The addition of these previously missing data decreased the percentage of eligible studies that would have had to be excluded by 33.5 percent (from 22.4 percent to 14.9 percent). Neither year of publication nor country in which the study was conducted (United States versus other) were significant predictors of whether missing data would be provided or not (p>.05). Conclusions:Moderate success was achieved in the acquisition of missing outcome data dealing with the effects of aerobic exercise on lipids and lipoproteins in adults. However, whether this level of response is true in other areas of research needs to be determined by additional research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The inability to acquire missing data from all eligible studies is not unexpected and deemed part of the meta-analysis process.
“The inability to acquire missing data from all eligible studies is not unexpected and deemed part of the meta-analysis process (Kelley et al., 2004).”
From Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp studies (2016) · cites this paper as Kelley et al., 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553 · see citing works
Wycherley, T. P., Moran, L. J., Clifton, P. M., Noakes, M., & Brinkworth, G. D. (2012) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.044321 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Cassar, S., Misso, M. L., Hopkins, W. G., Shaw, C. S., Teede, H. J., & Stepto, N. K. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dew243 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Kelley, G. A., & Kelley, K. S. (2007) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.014 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationAerobic exercise and HDL2-C: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Kelley, G. A., & Kelley, K. S. (2006) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.04.005 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationFinding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
Relevo, R., & Balshem, H. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kelley, G. A., Kelley, K. S., & Vu Tran, Z.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 296-299
- ISSN
- 0266-4623 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6348
- PMC
- PMC2443825
- OpenAlex
- W2125457608
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL069802, R01 HL 69802)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- meta-analysis, data availability, aerobic exercise, lipids, lipoproteins, publication year
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Lipids, Research Design, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review