Cited by 21Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsResearch Data Management Practicesscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Retrieval of missing data for meta-analysis: A practical example

Open access
Kelley, George A., Kelley, Kristi S., Vu Tran, Zung·2004·International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Abstract

Objectives:To examine the feasibility of retrieving missing outcome data for summary meta-analyses using an example dealing with the effects of aerobic exercise on lipids and lipoproteins in adults. Methods:Missing lipid and/or lipoprotein data from a currently developed meta-analytic data base were requested by means of electronic mail from 39 of 174 (22.4 percent) eligible studies. Binary logistic regression was used to examine whether year of publication and country were significant predictors for whether data would be provided. Results:Of the thirty-nine studies from which data were requested, usable data were received for thirteen (33.3 percent) of the studies. The addition of these previously missing data decreased the percentage of eligible studies that would have had to be excluded by 33.5 percent (from 22.4 percent to 14.9 percent). Neither year of publication nor country in which the study was conducted (United States versus other) were significant predictors of whether missing data would be provided or not (p>.05). Conclusions:Moderate success was achieved in the acquisition of missing outcome data dealing with the effects of aerobic exercise on lipids and lipoproteins in adults. However, whether this level of response is true in other areas of research needs to be determined by additional research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0266462304001114

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelley, G. A., Kelley, K. S., & Vu Tran, Z.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2004-08
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
296-299
ISSN
  • 0266-4623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6348
OpenAlex
W2125457608
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL069802, R01 HL 69802)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
meta-analysis, data availability, aerobic exercise, lipids, lipoproteins, publication year
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Lipids, Research Design, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review