The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: The goal of meeting the desire of older adults to remain independent in their home setting while controlling healthcare costs has led to the conceptualization of “smart homes.” A smart home is a residence equipped with technology that enhances safety of residents and monitors their health conditions. The study aim is to assess older adults’ perceptions of specific smart home technologies (i.e., a bed sensor, gait monitor, stove sensor, motion sensor, and video sensor). Methods: The study setting is TigerPlace, a retirement community designed according to the Aging in Place model. Focus group sessions with fourteen residents were conducted to assess perceived advantages and concerns associated with specific applications, and preferences for recipients of sensor-generated information pertaining to residents’ activity levels, sleep patterns and potential emergencies. Sessions were audio-taped; tapes were transcribed, and a content analysis was performed. Results: A total of fourteen older adults over the age of 65 participated in three focus group sessions Most applications were perceived as useful, and participants would agree to their installation in their own home. Preference for specific sensors related to sensors’ appearance and residents’ own level of frailty and perceived need. Specific concerns about privacy were raised. Conclusions: The findings indicate an overall positive attitude toward sensor technologies for nonobtrusive monitoring. Researchers and practitioners are called upon to address ethical and technical challenges in this emerging domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Cited by 18,576
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560
Krueger, R. A. (2000) · Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 3. · doi:10.1037/10518-189 · Cited by 1,519
Silhouette analysis-based gait recognition for human identification
Wang, L., Tan, T., Ning, H., & Hu, W. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1251144 · Cited by 1,202
The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research
Kidd, C. D., Orr, R., Abowd, G. D., Atkeson, C. G., Essa, I. A., MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., Starner, T. E., & Newstetter, W. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/10705432_17 · Cited by 1,035
Analyzing and Reporting Focus Group Results
Krueger, R. A. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 918
Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study
Demiris, G., Rantz, M. J., Aud, M. A., Marek, K. D., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M., & Hussam, A. A. (2004) · Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine · doi:10.1080/14639230410001684387 · Cited by 667
Self-citationAnalyzing & Reporting Focus Group Results
Krueger, R. (1998) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483328157 · Cited by 646
Handbook of human factors and the older adult
(1998) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/s0197-4572(98)90106-9 · Cited by 390
Aging in Place: A New Model for Long-Term Care
Marek, K. D., & Rantz, M. (2000) · Nursing Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1097/00006216-200004000-00003 · Cited by 149
Self-citation
Cited by
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review
Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2014) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004 · Cited by 1,206
Elderly Fall Detection Systems: A Literature Survey
Wang, X., Ellul, J., & Azzopardi, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00071 · Cited by 380
Zwijsen, S. A., Niemeijer, A. R., & Hertogh, C. M. P. M. (2011) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2010.543662 · Cited by 266
Smart-Home Technologies to Assist Older People to Live Well at Home
Kimberly Miller, A. A. (2013) · Journal of Aging Science · doi:10.4172/2329-8847.1000101 · Cited by 173
"Alexa is a Toy": Exploring Older Adults' Reasons for Using, Limiting, and Abandoning Echo
Trajkova, M., & Martin-Hammond, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376760 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Demiris, G., Hensel, B. K., Skubic, M., & Rantz, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-124
- ISSN
- 0266-4623 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6348
- OpenAlex
- W2121391047
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 33.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0266462307080154
- The paper
- Demiris, G., Hensel, B. K., Skubic, M., & Rantz, M. (2008). Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462307080154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.