Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 667

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study

Demiris, George, Rantz, Marilyn J, Aud, Myra A, Marek, Karen D, Tyrer, Harry W, Skubic, Marjorie, Hussam, Ali A·2004·Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine

Abstract

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The study aim is to explore the perceptions and expectations of seniors in regard to "smart home" technology installed and operated in their homes with the purpose of improving their quality of life and/or monitoring their health status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Three focus group sessions were conducted within this pilot study to assess older adults' perceptions of the technology and ways they believe technology can improve their daily lives. Themes discussed in these groups included participants' perceptions of the usefulness of devices and sensors in health-related issues such as preventing or detecting falls, assisting with visual or hearing impairments, improving mobility, reducing isolation, managing medications, and monitoring of physiological parameters. The audiotapes were transcribed and a content analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 15 older adults participated in three focus group sessions. Areas where advanced technologies would benefit older adult residents included emergency help, prevention and detection of falls, monitoring of physiological parameters, etc. Concerns were expressed about the user-friendliness of the devices, lack of human response and the need for training tailored to older learners. CONCLUSIONS: All participants had an overall positive attitude towards devices and sensors that can be installed in their homes in order to enhance their lives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14639230410001684387

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. CORRIGAN B., 1999, Geriatric nursing protocols for best practice
  2. EBERSOLE P., 2001, Geriatric nursing and health aging
  3. BERG C., 1994, Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe
  4. GANN D., 1999, Digital Futures: Making Homes Smarter
  5. HARDYMENT C., 1988, From Mangle to Microwave: The Mechanisation of HouseholdWork
  6. JOHNSON, R. A., 1999, Helping older adults adjust to relocation: Nursing interventions and issues. In edited by L. Swanson and T. Tripp-Riemer. Series on Advances in Gerontological Nursing, Vol. 2, Transitions in the Older Adult (New York: Springer).
  7. RANTZ M. J., 2003, Nurseweek, Midwest/Heartland Edition, 4, 7
  8. COLLINS, S. C., BHATTI, J. Z., DEXTER, S. L. and RABBITT, P. M., 1992, Elderly people in a new world: attitudes to advanced communications technologies. In edited by H. Boumqa and J. A. M. Graafmans Gerontechnology (Amsterdam: IOS Press).

Cited by

See all 667

Metadata

Authors
Demiris, G., Rantz, M. J., Aud, M. A., Marek, K. D., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M., & Hussam, A. A.
Venue
Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine
Published
2004-06
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
87-94
ISSN
1463-9238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992215715
Cited by
667
References
14
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14639230410001684387
The paper
Demiris, G., Rantz, M. J., Aud, M. A., Marek, K. D., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M., & Hussam, A. A. (2004). Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230410001684387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.